I've cleaned off enough to know what that is...Unless he’s filling up his gun with tap water I don’t think that’s calcium. Doesn’t look like oxidation either. Most likely the residue sb327 mentioned.
Upvote 0
I've cleaned off enough to know what that is...Unless he’s filling up his gun with tap water I don’t think that’s calcium. Doesn’t look like oxidation either. Most likely the residue sb327 mentioned.
I've cleaned off enough to know what that is...
The anodizing process submerges the part in an electrolytic bath. Electric current does its thing. The anodized area is now very porous and will accept a dye coloring. The part is then dyed but the dye doesn’t color (stick to) the area at the bottom of the tube that had an air pocket during the anodizing. (Bottom was probably at the top during process)Calcium, lime, and rust. I looked up it's friendliness with aluminum and I get mixed feedback. Wondering why the end of tube isn't anodized like the rest?
When you fill up your ultrasonic humidifier with tap water, sure.
Hey TFlat I owe you an apology man. I had no idea noob_to_this was filling his Leshiy inside of an oil pipeline. Fortunately for most of us we don’t have to worry about air laden with calcium from the precipitation of brine water which is a by product of oil drilling. Thanks for the info now I know not to fill my gun in a pipeline.You guys are exhausting... it's like you wake up and just want to argue about something.
For your reading pleasure: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c01538
…
Cheers,
T
Hey TFlat I owe you an apology man. I had no idea noob_to_this was filling his Leshiy inside of an oil pipeline. Fortunately for most of us we don’t have to worry about air laden with calcium from the precipitation of brine water which is a by product of oil drilling. Thanks for the info now I know not to fill my gun in a pipeline.
Now that we got that out of the way let’s focus on the more important topic. Nothing more that really needs to be said in this thread except waiting for conclusions from Ed and Marko
“I don't know, can be the mistake during the making tests. My results exactly meets the calculations.”
Sorry but this reply is hardly satisfactory- it clearly failed at 450 bar - there’s no mistake. And why all
The machining discrepancies / differences in the tubes?
Hello, Ed!
I have a suggestion for you. A fixture for holding a sheet of sandpaper.
Simple design, easy to make and very useful throughout your whole shop
Top surface of the aluminum plate (under the sandpaper) is ground perfectly flat.
Cheers from Detroit!
Ed - I’ve been watching and reading this thread with interest. With that said, I think what may be separating your thoughts from some others is how you define the word “failure” as it applies here, as opposed to how other Engineers define “failure” in this application.
I’m not challenging or trying to assign blame, only trying to help clarify.
Thomas Himes
Mechanical Engineer
I’m pretty sure it’s where an air pocket happens during the anodizing and again during the dyeing process. All of my Leshiy2 tubes have it. If it can be cleaned, clean it. It’s not of any concern/worry.
Oxidation will appear whitish/powdery.
Jmo,
Dave
Now that we got that out of the way let’s focus on the more important topic. Nothing more that really needs to be said in this thread except waiting for conclusions from Ed and Marko
When you imported the rifle into the USA, are you required to meet the ASME of 3.5Xwp ?So, you hint that we either have not enough knowledge in that sphere or, consciously misled public? I cannot find another reason why you accept one point of view (Marko) and even don't want to consider a chance that there was something wrong on his side? Really?
From my side I can give over 20th years experience in that and NO ONE case of any accidants with the high-pressure parts of our guns. About 100'000 guns. Don't you think that is huge overweight above Marko's reulst and conclusions?
Thank you! In fact we have even the flatpolishing machine but I decided to do it manually for better picture for video
Right, I can make a mistake in the way of right using word or using the wrong word, but I guess you got the clue The main thing is that Marko used the other model for his calculation which doesn't meet the reallity and he has confirmed it.
Right, the inside surface is anodizing as the side process, not the main process.
The remains are about to be sent to the special criminal labarotroy to make all test they can do (beginnig from the metall test and ending the the looking for the parts of other materials remaining after explosing). The laboratory is specialized on that, investigating different terror acts and so on. That is the State laboratory, not the private one.
The same here in Russia, the test pressure is 1.5 of working pressure. That is because the test pressure shouldn't be close or overcome the limit of the plastic deformation of the material. And I've shown with the meassurement that it is, not plastic deformation. The next step -- the attempt to destroy the tube, as you could see I've achieved the pressure close to 800 bar, that makes 2.6 times over working pressure (Marko's result was close to it). No detruction. Based on my experience (and calculations) the destruction process can start with the pressure much over 1'000 bar (close to 3.5 time factor), that is why I neven ever for 20 years of work managed to destroy it), I will get the new pump at the end of May and will try to destroy it just to know how close the calculation is to the reallity. But I think I will not be able achieve that due to the fact that O-ring will be destroyed first, I have passed that already.
Just for your enjoy -- watch this
So, you hint that we either have not enough knowledge in that sphere or, consciously misled public? I cannot find another reason why you accept one point of view (Marko) and even don't want to consider a chance that there was something wrong on his side? Really?
From my side I can give over 20th years experience in that and NO ONE case of any accidants with the high-pressure parts of our guns. About 100'000 guns. Don't you think that is huge overweight above Marko's reulst and conclusions?
Thank you! In fact we have even the flatpolishing machine but I decided to do it manually for better picture for video
Right, I can make a mistake in the way of right using word or using the wrong word, but I guess you got the clue The main thing is that Marko used the other model for his calculation which doesn't meet the reallity and he has confirmed it.
Right, the inside surface is anodizing as the side process, not the main process.
The remains are about to be sent to the special criminal labarotroy to make all test they can do (beginnig from the metall test and ending the the looking for the parts of other materials remaining after explosing). The laboratory is specialized on that, investigating different terror acts and so on. That is the State laboratory, not the private one.
The same here in Russia, the test pressure is 1.5 of working pressure. That is because the test pressure shouldn't be close or overcome the limit of the plastic deformation of the material. And I've shown with the meassurement that it is, not plastic deformation. The next step -- the attempt to destroy the tube, as you could see I've achieved the pressure close to 800 bar, that makes 2.6 times over working pressure (Marko's result was close to it). No detruction. Based on my experience (and calculations) the destruction process can start with the pressure much over 1'000 bar (close to 3.5 time factor), that is why I neven ever for 20 years of work managed to destroy it), I will get the new pump at the end of May and will try to destroy it just to know how close the calculation is to the reallity. But I think I will not be able achieve that due to the fact that O-ring will be destroyed first, I have passed that already.
Just for your enjoy -- watch this
Great test a man that stands by his products. However over melodramatic since you probably filled the reservoir with non compressible fluid probably hydraulic fluid. So that even if the reservoir failed you would not face death. Now if it was actually filled with compressed air. The danger would be genuine.So, you hint that we either have not enough knowledge in that sphere or, consciously misled public? I cannot find another reason why you accept one point of view (Marko) and even don't want to consider a chance that there was something wrong on his side? Really?
From my side I can give over 20th years experience in that and NO ONE case of any accidants with the high-pressure parts of our guns. About 100'000 guns. Don't you think that is huge overweight above Marko's reulst and conclusions?
Thank you! In fact we have even the flatpolishing machine but I decided to do it manually for better picture for video
Right, I can make a mistake in the way of right using word or using the wrong word, but I guess you got the clue The main thing is that Marko used the other model for his calculation which doesn't meet the reallity and he has confirmed it.
Right, the inside surface is anodizing as the side process, not the main process.
The remains are about to be sent to the special criminal labarotroy to make all test they can do (beginnig from the metall test and ending the the looking for the parts of other materials remaining after explosing). The laboratory is specialized on that, investigating different terror acts and so on. That is the State laboratory, not the private one.
The same here in Russia, the test pressure is 1.5 of working pressure. That is because the test pressure shouldn't be close or overcome the limit of the plastic deformation of the material. And I've shown with the meassurement that it is, not plastic deformation. The next step -- the attempt to destroy the tube, as you could see I've achieved the pressure close to 800 bar, that makes 2.6 times over working pressure (Marko's result was close to it). No detruction. Based on my experience (and calculations) the destruction process can start with the pressure much over 1'000 bar (close to 3.5 time factor), that is why I neven ever for 20 years of work managed to destroy it), I will get the new pump at the end of May and will try to destroy it just to know how close the calculation is to the reallity. But I think I will not be able achieve that due to the fact that O-ring will be destroyed first, I have passed that already.
Just for your enjoy -- watch this
You want me to follow that way just to amuse the sense of self-worth of the venerable public? The result will be the same, since I will not be able to pump it over 300 bar with the air.Not that it
Great test a man that stands by his products. However over melodramatic since you probably filled the reservoir with non compressible fluid probably hydraulic fluid. So that even if the reservoir failed you would not face death. Now if it was actually filled with compressed air. The danger would be genuine.