*The discussion of the creation, fabrication, or modification of airgun moderators is prohibited. The discussion of any "adapters" used to convert an airgun moderator to a firearm silencer will result in immediate termination of the account.*
A linear compensator on an airgun would work like an air stripper that has vents pointing forwards. If the forward vents direct air far away from the projectile path, then it should work well enough. A more conventional air stripper has vents that are directed more to the sides - to reduce turbulence along or near the projectile path.
The concept of a linear compensator on a PB seems like a muzzle brake that is less effective, because if the whole point is recoil reduction, why direct any gas to jet forwards? The problem is that the more effective compensators are very loud to the shooter. So, basically a linear comp is a jumbo shrimp marketing opportunity. More than reduce recoil; it reduces blast to the shooter; and increases profits to the manufacturer. How much recoil does it "compensate"? Probably none, beyond that caused by the added mass.
What are your goals / concerns? The guys that tested my linear and radial comp designs said it was loud, compared to the muffler inserts I designed for the Avenger PCP. I think that was expected. Its purpose is only to clean up the air in the pellet path.
Here is the front end of such a 3D printed air stripper / linear comp I designed for the Avenger. It sports a double reflex air stripper, feeding the rear of the shroud:
Here is a variant with radial vents in front of the shroud:
Would you like to try a linear comp on your PCP? If so, what caliber, mounting thread and overall dimensions constraints apply to your application? I ask, because I am offering to design one for you for free. You could have it printed for less than $20, if you don't have your own 3D printer; or printer guy.
If you don't feel the need to acknowledge this free offer, then perhaps my posts to your thread are shyte and should be deleted. Please advise.