. . . in reg and/or hammer spring settings.
Playing around with another one of my toys. It's amazing how the slightest little changes can make a big difference. Readers digest - I had an initial tune set on this gun shooting 36.2g ( .25 cal ) slugs at around 906fps. They were pretty good at 100 yards but I thought could have been better / a tighter group. I figured if I adjusted the power a little to send them 915 - 920fps that might tighten them up.
____ NEGATIVE ____
Instead the grouping (at pretty much all ranges - 40, 70, 100 yds) opened up and got worse. I backed it back down and now have it settled at around 908fps. Not to shabby considering there is a little bit of a breeze going on now - good thing about the wind was that it was mostly steady. Operative word in that last sentence - "mostly".
Marked - shots #1 and #10. #1 was basically the sighter - ok - wind is pulling a bit to the right - I'll just compensate and hold off to the left. Guess what got turned off / stopped at shot #10? {sigh} lol
Playing around with another one of my toys. It's amazing how the slightest little changes can make a big difference. Readers digest - I had an initial tune set on this gun shooting 36.2g ( .25 cal ) slugs at around 906fps. They were pretty good at 100 yards but I thought could have been better / a tighter group. I figured if I adjusted the power a little to send them 915 - 920fps that might tighten them up.
____ NEGATIVE ____
Instead the grouping (at pretty much all ranges - 40, 70, 100 yds) opened up and got worse. I backed it back down and now have it settled at around 908fps. Not to shabby considering there is a little bit of a breeze going on now - good thing about the wind was that it was mostly steady. Operative word in that last sentence - "mostly".
Marked - shots #1 and #10. #1 was basically the sighter - ok - wind is pulling a bit to the right - I'll just compensate and hold off to the left. Guess what got turned off / stopped at shot #10? {sigh} lol