In the past I used open sights then tried 4x scope and red dots, because of what I was shooting....22LR then away from that cause of hoarders to Mrod. Now as I moved up to a Mutant Short it is much more precise so I'm moving up in scope as well. I don't see myself getting anything else in the near future...well maybe a mutant in .25 if that ever comes out.
Checking out the different reticles I really like the mil dot seems so much simpler and easier with elevation/windage to just move over a few dots....guess that could be said about MOA "dot" as well. Now I have read into the MIL vs MOA and am still kinda trying to wrap my head around it. What got me really off is some scopes have MIL dots but use MOA turrets or vice versa, what is up with that?!
As an air gunner shooting small targets within 100yrds/meters, mostly 50meters/yards or less it seems like MOA is better cause of the smaller unit per click. Also seem like some MIL dot reticles are really large and cover up small targets.
What are your thoughts, opinions and advice?
Checking out the different reticles I really like the mil dot seems so much simpler and easier with elevation/windage to just move over a few dots....guess that could be said about MOA "dot" as well. Now I have read into the MIL vs MOA and am still kinda trying to wrap my head around it. What got me really off is some scopes have MIL dots but use MOA turrets or vice versa, what is up with that?!
As an air gunner shooting small targets within 100yrds/meters, mostly 50meters/yards or less it seems like MOA is better cause of the smaller unit per click. Also seem like some MIL dot reticles are really large and cover up small targets.
What are your thoughts, opinions and advice?