RTI Mora .25 caliber at 100 yds.

Took the RTI Mora in 25 cal out to shoot 100 yards today with AEA 29.6 grain pellets. After having only marginal success with the 33.9 grains, I decided to jump to a different pellet weight. Well, you gotta love it when a plan comes together. I decided to use the same basic settings as I had been playing with for the 33.9 grain pellets. The problem I had with the 33s is that they would randomly throw a flyer or two out of about every 10 shots. When I say flyer, I mean they would drift off my POA by anywhere from 1/2 MOA to 1 MOA which in 100 yd benchrest is as much as a 2 point drop in score. This happened consistently regardless of the speeds I tried. Every tune I tried from 900 to 970 fps would throw these random flyers and they were truly random without any consistent pattern. These are the same 33.9s that produce incredible consistency when shot out of my Skout Epoch .25. But, for whatever reason, the Mora simply doesn't seem to get along with them, so I jumped down to 29.6s not particularly hopeful that anything would change. Boy, was I wrong. The Mora and these 29.6 apparently have a love affair that I couldn't have guessed at. Although I'm not particulary impressed with my standard deviation numbers, I really can't complain considering the POI results.
It appears that the 975 tune was the optimal number in all aspects
All of these use the same 120 reg pressure and the differences were tuned via the dwell valve adjuster.

Target #1 scored as a 238 @ 8X @ 975.3 fps 3.2 sd
Target #2 scored as a 235 @ 2X @ 978.7 fps 3.6 sd
Target #3 scored as a 231 @ 6X @ 981.2 fps 4.5 sd

*** It's important to remember that although I'm considered a decent shooter, I'm not anything special so my results can pretty much be expected by anyone who shoots with any regularity.

RTI Mora 25 Cal #1 100yds AEA 29gr pellets 20250409.jpg


RTI Mora 25 Cal #1 Chrono.jpg


RTI Mora 25 Cal #2 100yds AEA 29gr pellets20250409.jpg


RTI Mora 25 Cal #2 Chrono.jpg


RTI Mora 25 Cal #3 100yds AEA 29gr pellets20250409.jpg


RTI Mora 25 Cal #3 Chrono.jpg
 
Last edited:
Very nice shooting Joe!
Finding it ironic how some of the pellets speed settings would have been torn apart a few years ago ...but now are working out

Ever try using 2 chrono's-at muzzle and at target(100yrd) to see how consistent the S.D. stays on both
at the higher speeds, i have noticed a wobble in flight .
i figure if the deviation is constant at target, i have a stable pellet flight
 
"My Epoch loves the 24 gr as well... Just curious, have you tried slugs yet ?"


Not yet. I've been one of the only folks I know that has resisted the move to slugs. As a BR shooter and not a hunter, I've was anti-slug for years. As little as two years ago, there simply weren't any slugs that could compete with pellet accuracy at 100 yards or less. Well, needless to say, during that two year span, things have changed dramatically. Both gun and pellet manufacturers have taken on the mantle of designing products that take advantage of the inherent stability and energy retention of slugs and what has emerged is IMO revolutionary.

As a media guy whose platform is sponsored by AEA's projectile division, it's become a priority for me this year to move into that realm. I have received a shipment of slugs that await my first opportunity to get out to my local long distance range and begin testing. Knowing the manufacturer Mr. Yang as I do (his intense propensity for detail and precision), I'm confident that the AEA slug products will be every bit as good as their pellet product which IME is currently the best in the industry.

AEA Slugs.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17dean and MACTEN
Very nice shooting Joe!
Finding it ironic how some of the pellets speed settings would have been torn apart a few years ago ...but now are working out

Ever try using 2 chrono's-at muzzle and at target(100yrd) to see how consistent the S.D. stays on both
at the higher speeds, i have noticed a wobble in flight .
i figure if the deviation is constant at target, i have a stable pellet flight
Hi...

I have used two chonographs simultaneously on several occasions however, this was not so much to evaluate projectile speeds as it was an effort to compare chornographs. I actually have a comparison review of five current model chonographs (Labradar LX, FX True Ballistic, Garmin Xero C1, Caldwell Velociradar and the FX Pocket Chrony) coming out shortly. It will be in file format available on tABC (the Airgun Benchrest Channel on FB) and I will post it as a thread here as well. Look for it by the end of the month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: manabeknives