I willI've followed the Mora since it's first mention.
Waited, hoped, dreaming for the big release. Saved my pennies etc. Completed most of the tasks on the wife's list, she controls the funds. Optimistically waited. Even communicating with RTI.
Life changed, financial changes, health etc. Do I still want a Mora, yes.
This time I'm only window shopping, those that get a Mora, enjoy but please keep us updated.
Agreed - finally something new that looks different and interesting . . . and I have no idea where to get one, what calibers they'll be available in and how much it'll cost.some of these models look awesome!
Who brings these in to the USA? Who ever it is is doing a terrible job representing them.
I saw the same 52fpe in 177 spec mentioned very briefly in this video.Have you seen any specs for the "Nightmare"??....
I saw the same 52fpe in 177 spec mentioned very briefly in this video.
This is for the standard 600mm barrel length. Also mentions 90fpe in .22 and 130fpe in .25. Very impressive numbers and appears to be a slug oriented airgun. This may be my first RTI if the final product is as good as it appears.
We can compare it with a PB only if we talk about the .22 caliber. It's the only subsonic caliber usually used in PBs. All the other (.17, .257, .30 and .35) perform way worse than the corresponding PBs. I don't mean they are less accurate within certain distances, but they have a much lower initial speed, so...Is it just me or does it sound like a powder burner?
What I’m referring to is the sound that the video camera picks up near the target @ 110 yds away. I shot a .45 Texan SS in an enclosed 40’x40’ warehouse and I really didn’t think it was PB loud. The Mora at the bench you can hear the tank ping but not so much of the actual report.We can compare it with a PB only if we talk about the .22 caliber. It's the only subsonic caliber usually used in PBs. All the other (.17, .257, .30 and .35) perform way worse than the corresponding PBs. I don't mean they are less accurate within certain distances, but they have a much lower initial speed, so...
There are several dealers in the US.some of these models look awesome!
Who brings these in to the USA? Who ever it is is doing a terrible job representing them.
The Epic Two has 53 fpe in .177...Never liked bullpups until now!!!. Imagine .177cal 24grain slugs @ 980-1000 ft/sec....Holy mother mackerel.
?We can compare it with a PB only if we talk about the .22 caliber. It's the only subsonic caliber usually used in PBs. All the other (.17, .257, .30 and .35) perform way worse than the corresponding PBs. I don't mean they are less accurate within certain distances, but they have a much lower initial speed, so...
Yup, for sure, but nothing to do with similar PB caliber. Just take a look at every 9mm PCC 16inch barrel.?
Did you look the protype .357 in action?
Gregor was putting down 215 FPE, using a 112 grain slug, 930 FPS, grouping 1" MOA and slamming that tiny spinner at 111 yards to the point it was getting bent out of shape. For air rifle performance this is great to shoot slugs like that with power to hunt. RTI makes good products and I think this will be like the Huben a game changer but for the rifle sector
Good for you, you can spare some moneyEpic also claim 79J / 58 FP with a Beast pellet in .177 Two
Mora look okay, but somehow the RTI rifles never rung my bell.