Mueller Optics

[jps2486]

I have used Mueller scopes for many years when I first got into air rifle BR shooting. Their 8-32 Target Dot scope works well and for less than $300 is a bargain. I now have gotten into more sophisticated stuff, but I would not hesitate to buy another Mueller scope. This new 6-24X50 scope has all the features that an airgunner needs for general shooting. It has an illuminated reticle of a design I like best out of all the scopes I've owned over the years. I think it's SFP too which I prefer. Mueller has been around for many years, but I don't seem to see much discussion about them here. You might want to try this one.

6-24x50 Scope by Mueller Optics

Check out our 6-24x50 scope today. At a great price while still maintaining great quality our 6-24x50 scope will get you on target quickly.

www.muelleroptics.com

 

[boscoebrea]

I also used Mueller scopes,.the price was right and I had no problem seeing the small targets at 100 yards away.

The fact is I have 3 different Mueller scopes.I must admit I do not know how many scopes I have, more than too many.

 

[Franklink]

I've gotta agree, looks like a decent option for airgunners.
10 yard min parallax and 0.2 increments in the holdover area of the reticle. Two big "pros."

 

[steve123]

I've gotta agree, looks like a decent option for airgunners.
10 yard min parallax and 0.2 increments in the holdover area of the reticle. Two big "pros."

It looks like a MIL reticle with .2 hashes and 1/4 MOA clicks but its possible those are 1 MOA hashes instead.

But "if" SFP, 1/4 MOA clicks, and a MIL reticle, that's the worst scenario to me.

I remember Bobby having a Mueller and the reticle would move around in the view but can't remember exactly if it was the ocular being loose or when magnification was changed???
Can't judge with a sample of one though.

 

[Franklink]

It looks like a MIL reticle with .2 hashes and 1/4 MOA clicks but its possible those are 1 MOA hashes instead.

But "if" SFP, 1/4 MOA clicks, and a MIL reticle, that's the worst scenario to me.

I remember Bobby having a Mueller and the reticle would move around in the view but can't remember exactly if it was the ocular being loose or when magnification was changed???
Can't judge with a sample of one though.

I was assuming each major graduation in the reticle was an moa but I agree, mismatched reticle and click values are something we shouldnt still have to deal with. At least not on a new scope.

Like always with a scope, would sure love to look through it (WITHOUT buying one).

 

[Arzrover]

It looks like a MIL reticle with .2 hashes and 1/4 MOA clicks but its possible those are 1 MOA hashes instead.

But "if" SFP, 1/4 MOA clicks, and a MIL reticle, that's the worst scenario to me.

I remember Bobby having a Mueller and the reticle would move around in the view but can't remember exactly if it was the ocular being loose or when magnification was changed???
Can't judge with a sample of one though.

No Mueller's for me...
Wouldn't mind checking them out sometime...
I had a Discovery that was about as bad as I've ever used, though... no matter how good they MIGHT be, wouldn't risk another. My UTG's are way better.
Bob

 

[jps2486]

No Mueller's for me...
Wouldn't mind checking them out sometime...
I had a Discovery that was about as bad as I've ever used, though... no matter how good they MIGHT be, wouldn't risk another. My UTG's are way better.
Bob

The Muellers that I've had are far better than UTGs.

 

[cavedweller]

I've gotta agree, looks like a decent option for airgunners.
10 yard min parallax and 0.2 increments in the holdover area of the reticle. Two big "pros."

My brain needs numbers marking the hash marks