So..
Is there any reason a muzzle brake could not be placed inside a shroud? There's a couple of new muzzle brake add-ons for after the air goes through a moderator.
The RTI P1 has a barrel spacer.."doughhnut with holes"..that allows air back into the shroud. It's not really a brake per se because it does not divert air..just allows a tiny bit to flow back into the shroud via the doughnut holes.
So wouldn't a "real brake"..that physically redirects air back into a shroud..thus lessening the amount of air going through an attached moderator..lower the dBs?
Being inside the shroud would not be acting as a brake..more like an air diverter/stripper?
Too much turbulance as the pellet passes through the "brake within the shroud"?
Is there any reason a muzzle brake could not be placed inside a shroud? There's a couple of new muzzle brake add-ons for after the air goes through a moderator.
The RTI P1 has a barrel spacer.."doughhnut with holes"..that allows air back into the shroud. It's not really a brake per se because it does not divert air..just allows a tiny bit to flow back into the shroud via the doughnut holes.
So wouldn't a "real brake"..that physically redirects air back into a shroud..thus lessening the amount of air going through an attached moderator..lower the dBs?
Being inside the shroud would not be acting as a brake..more like an air diverter/stripper?
Too much turbulance as the pellet passes through the "brake within the shroud"?
Last edited: