• *The discussion of the creation, fabrication, or modification of airgun moderators is prohibited. The discussion of any "adapters" used to convert an airgun moderator to a firearm silencer will result in immediate termination of the account.*

Nature For Moderator Internals

Was thumbing through a NatGeo magazine and saw the origami picture and immediately thought of 3D-printed cone baffles.
IMG-ConeBaffle.JPG
Then read the article about otters and maybe a 3D-printed version of otter hair instead of felt.
img-OtterFur.JPG
Last but not least, honeycomb hex shapes to trap air.
img-HoneyComb.png
Too much time on my hands, I guess.
 
How about a snail shell for inspiration? This is a section view of a Huben pistol muffler that is about to be tested for function and robustness that I designed:

huben-25-pistol-shorty-spiral-offset-muffler9-jpg.388984



There is also a double spiral version. The odd looking structures inside are permanent supports to enable FDM 3D printing:

1695353906990blob.png


4Huben_Spirals.jpg


Huben_printing.jpg
 
Last edited:
One has to start by capturing an idea so you can contemplate it, and analyze it. Then, that will inspire improved ideas. Even if you have to cut off half and turn it upside down :) Throwing out an idea too soon because of a perceived shortcoming, is to throw away the seeds of a great idea.

Hexagons are material efficient, and stiff in compression, straight into the "page", as drawn above. From the side, triangles are much stiffer and stronger, but have less usable space inside, if you want to grow a bee larva, for example.

Hexagons are strong when bonded to a stiff front and rear metal or carbon fiber sheet. Then, all the little walls in the hex adds multidirectional shear strength; and by spacing the cover sheets apart, adds huge bend stiffness and strength to the composite structure. This, while adding little weight. That is why such hex stiffening materials are popular in aerospace structures:

A bunch of triangles can be arranged to form hexagons; then you have both shapes. Here is the outside of a muffler I designed for someone:

matthias-30-triangulated-casing-50-x-130-mm-b-jpg.389145
 
Last edited:
Taking a quick look at how 3 dimensional hexagonal structures stack around the perimeter of a circle, there may be a problem: The side walls have to be radial to fit in parallel with each other, but if you do not also taper the other four sides, the shape is no longer hexagonal.

Making a 3D hex and stacking them in a circle, so that the hexes meet at the circle OD, creates a gap at between hexes at the circle ID.

So, some form of distorted hex will be required to stack properly with shared walls between hex cells it seems.





hex ring.JPG
hex ring OD.JPG
hex ring ID.JPG
hex ring ID gaps.JPG
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PumaCarl
Taking a quick look at how 3 dimensional hexagonal structures stack around the perimeter of a circle, there may be a problem: The side walls have to be radial to fit in parallel with each other, but if you do not also taper the other four sides, the shape is no longer hexagonal.

Making a 3D hex and stacking them in a circle, so that the hexes meet at the circle OD, creates a gap at between hexes at the circle ID.

So, some form of distorted hex will be required to stack properly with shared walls between hex cells it seems.





View attachment 391638View attachment 391639View attachment 391640View attachment 391641
Yes. A "Distorted Hex" shape woud be required. More of a Funnel or Trapezoidal Hex shape. The "pots" would trap the air and the "venturi" would accelerate the air into the "escape channels"..but the opposing shapes would nest within each other. Great CAD drawing BTW..What program?
 
I have FWB 603 and I’m looking for the perfect size hair curlers to fit shroud.
I’m curious if you ,that have silenced yours this way could tell me where you found them and/or size. Thanks
Just put an end cap on it and be done. They shoot so gently that you don't need a full baffle stack.