I need a TOUGH airgun scope. Going on a Beeman Kodiak Magnum (Webley Patriot). Spring gun so harsh on optics. Budget very limited right now. Has to be a 1" tube to fit my rings.
There are a couple on the Airguns of Arizona used page.Look for any Bushnell elite 3200 or 4200 series scopes. These are the earlier ones, always see them at gunshows for a couple hundred bucks and some on ebay. They can handle springer or gasram recoil..
firearm recoil and spring/gas gun recoil is different. There is no way I'd put a digital scope on a springer.I am running into the same problem with my Benjamin Trail NP XL .17. Has been eating the UTG scopes, on 3rd. Will try a Sightmark Wraith 4-32 x 50 Digital Scope. On sale now for under $400. Recoil rated to a .308, hope that works.
Please explain.firearm recoil and spring/gas gun recoil is different. There is no way I'd put a digital scope on a springer.
Like Rob mentioned, Warranty is an important factor when considering glass for a Springer. The double recoil on a Springer can and will destroy optics that are even rated for 50 BMG. I have 2 of the "better" UTG scopes (Lol) sitting on my bench that are wasted thanx to magnum springers. Those were bought many many years ago when I was rather stupid & ignorant. Now I am the type of person who belives you should spend as much money if not more on good glass as the weapon your putting it on. There are many manufactures who have unconditional, no questions asked, lifetime warranties. Those are the ones I would stick with. Cyclopes Joe, is an avid air rifle shooter who is also a member here. Has a great YT channel who reveiws scopes, many for air rifles. He's a great guy whom you can ask direct advice from if needed.Please explain.
I could be wrong but isn't there less moving parts on a digital scope compared to a "regular/erector tube" scope? Additionally, a digital scope is not dependent on mechanical means to hold zerofirearm recoil and spring/gas gun recoil is different. There is no way I'd put a digital scope on a springer.
You very well could be right. I just personally have never heard of anyone using one on a springer and I'm not willing to be the test pilot...hahaI could be wrong but isn't there less moving parts on a digital scope compared to a "regular/erector tube" scope? Additionally, a digital scope is not dependent on mechanical means to hold zero
Again, I could be wrong but most electronics today are designed pretty robustly to absorb impacts (laptops and cellphones, granted not at the G forces that springers generate). The only weak points I could see would be soldered connections.
Again just my opinion but given these design parameters, one could reason that in general, a digital scope might be more suitable for a recoiling springer.
I agree, check with the digital scope manufacturer.
and
Maybe we can get one of the digital scope user and/or designer to weight in on this issue.