The most intriguing aspect of the Red Panda to me is the barrel, which leads into the discussion of guns used in comp being "stock" versus no limits.
Having very few equipment restrictions (current situation in the high profile airgun comps) is the ideal setting for making advancements in performance and equipment.
In my opinion, the barrel itself carries the most weight in the accuracy/precision recipe. Not ALL the weight, but the most. Recipe components being: barrel, gun, ammo, scope, supports (sleds/bipods/bags), shooter.
Due the the nature of air rifles, restricting the equipment would be a very difficult proposition. And there are many aspects here, but in my example of the barrel.....what would we do there? You can only use a certain manufacturer or twist rate or choke or type of rifling? Complicated situation.
Take field target competitions for example, there ARE equipment restricted classes, Hunter for example, doesn't allow shooting jackets or butt hooks or deep knee risers or adjusting anything on the stock during the match, or scope magnification above 16x. While WFTF allows nearly any/all ancillary aids. And the big BUT here, even in the most equipment restricted class of Hunter, a guy can rebarrel his gun with whatever he wants.
There is a huge discrepancy from barrel to barrel, even when those barrels are supposedly from the same manufacturer with the same twist rate and same rifling and choke. The barrel is the biggest way to make large gains in accuracy/precision.
So, back to the Red Panda barrel...I've not seen any details released about the barrel. Are they being made in-house? Rifling type? Chokes? Etc. Whatever that barrel is, it and being used by Thaynes skill, are the biggest factors in why the Red Panda kicked butt last year.