Question is, why call it a different name? If it’s replacing the dremaline platform, then keep it all under the panthera name. Calling it another name is just confusing. It has some great modularity, that’s for sure, but coming out with a “new rifle” isn’t what I’m seeing here.
I also agree the crown mk3 should be their next big investment. The panthera platform is perfect for it. Just change gauge location, and add a nice traditional stock, and you’ll have something really awesome!!
I think it’s bad marketing personally. A sign that maybe FX is losing its way!... short answer
MARKETING
Right, but what about the panthera hunter they came out with a couple months ago? That should be under the dynamic name no? It’s just all over the place!It looks like the Pathera is a target line and Dynamic is a hunting centered line.
It's all about sales, at least they provide excellent customer service as part of their business model.
Similar to their silence after rmac and not taking first or second place benchrest titles. In my opinion, they need to be doubling down, not backing off.This launch is pretty weak by FX standards. There’s usually a simultaneous flood of videos by their sponsored channels along with wordy press releases and social media posts.
Weird.
I mean yes but no a the same time. You're not gonna PRS with the .35 most likely haha. I mean maybe but it seems when they designed this and added the bottle to the back for the higher shot count it was like okay well lets do some variations here. Essentially this has spawned a new modern traditional rifle like how the EBR did in the firearms world. I think its pretty neat to be honest. You get that hardcore tactical look, higher shot count with multiple bottle variations, and now the .35. I don't see a reaosn to be upset lol.... short answer
MARKETING