Hi guys. I was wondering about the new system and how it works. I have looked on here and am still in the dark. Thanks in advance for any help
It's my understanding It's being worked on.Hi guys. I was wondering about the new system and how it works. I have looked on here and am still in the dark. Thanks in advance for any help
Thank you a gave you positive feedback but your number is still 18. So what is reaction score mean?1) Click a user's avatar.
2) In the window that pops up click the user's name.
You will get something that looks like this...
View attachment 267843
Seems to be likes on posts.Thank you a gave you positive feedback but your number is still 18. So what is reaction score mean?
No, I believe it's just all the likes you've received since you joined and accuracy is completely absent.I think you are right. It looks like it adds to your old "accuracy score". Maybe?
I only have nine likes since the new system started. You have a 66 on that score.No, I believe it's just all the likes you've received since you joined and accuracy is completely absent.
Yeah, they will be. If that is the worst thing that comes from this change over, then the dev's did a hell of a job. Look, Michael absolutely needed to get the poor performance of the old forum addressed. Tell me you don't remember waiting thirty, forty seconds to load each page, if you can. Tell me about the image upload problem you spent half a day finding a work around for. People are upset because all the anonymous flowers they had on their profiles are gone, bah. Just suck it up and get more flowers.Even if Michael restores the points all the accuracy comments will be gone.
I don't know what Michael said yesterday, so sorry. As for accuracy/feedback, I much prefer no anonymous anything. Makes for a whole lot less confusion. But to be completely honest, I strongly miss the whole negative points aspect of the old points system before some clown came along and pooed that scrooch. Whatever you can't always get what you want, but if you try some times, you may just get what you need.I just reiterated what Michael said yesterday. As for accuracy/feedback comments I liked the readers digest condensed version.
I always signed my feedback. I'm glad the negative was removed. It was just a cowardly way to attack people anonymously. Some people are so unhappy with themselves they lash out at others like some sort of fouke monster.I don't know what Michael said yesterday, so sorry. As for accuracy/feedback, I much prefer no anonymous anything. Makes for a whole lot less confusion. But to be completely honest, I strongly miss the whole negative points aspect of the old points system before some clown came along and pooed that scrooch. Whatever you can't always get what you want, but if you try some times, you may just get what you need.
Stay safe.
There is a profound observation... but what is a "fouke monster".I always signed my feedback. I'm glad the negative was removed. It was just a cowardly way to attack people anonymously. Some people are so unhappy with themselves they lash out at others like some sort of fouke monster.
There is a profound observation... but what is a "fouke monster".