...and they aren't kidding. This has LESS recoil than a PCP rifle. Is it accurate? See for yourself in this full review. ....Also, guess what? Your probably getting one!
Thanks for watching! -Nate
Thanks for watching! -Nate
Hey Nate...and they aren't kidding. This has LESS recoil than a PCP rifle. Is it accurate? See for yourself in this full review. ....Also, guess what? Your probably getting one!
Thanks for watching! -Nate
SteveI get that many shooters like the tactical look, even own a couple myself, but put one of my Beeman's, HW or Dianas in that thing? No thanks.
I was interested when first chatter about them came out, but I'm not $400 interested.
Good question. I would not be able to tell you. That's a great idea though! -NateHey Nate
Thank you for the review.
Any chance a more accurate springer could fit into that stock? Like an R9, TX200, HW 50 etc? Is there enough flexibility to retro fit a more accurate <12 FPE action in there?
I think Norica should bake that action into some traditional rifles. I prefer a traditional wood rifle over the tactical setup any day...except the Pantera, that thing is perfect.Steve
I totally agree with some of your comments.
Given a choice (accuracy being equal) I would choose a classical wooden stock over a tactical look every time.
But think about the potential to use ANY scope on ANY springers. I've tuned my 12 FPE TX to the nth degree partly for recoil management but also to ensure my scopes survive on my springers. I've head of 12 FPE springers destroying scopes (usually in the middle of a Field Target match, and scopes supposedly build for springer recoil).
I think this is potentially another way for the industry to mitigate some of the frustrations of some springer shooters. i.e. buying and trying different scopes, putting them on springers and praying that these scopes will survive these violent recoils for another shooting season.
I know some field target shooters would welcome the option of shooting a springer if it had the recoilless and accuracy qualities of a low to mid level PCP without the associated costs and accessories associate with a PCP.
Thank you for reading this. I apologize as I can be long winded at times.
Not trying to change your mind. Just trying to widen springer horizon for others.
That was just my first shot. It had solvent in the bore still. It does not smoke normaly.Interesting. Is it dieseling out of the breech? Seems like a lot of smoke coming out of the top.
To be honest, i'm surprised it has taken a manufacturer this long to come out with something of this sort.
Could be a hit.
Tom is up to part 6 on his Omnia review.looks cool. Hopefully Tom Gaylord will review it (if he has not done it already, if so would someone post). I will wait till then.
Do it in some very nice wood and I might change my mind...lol.Steve
I totally agree with some of your comments.
Given a choice (accuracy being equal) I would choose a classic wooden stock over a tactical look every time.
But think about the potential to use ANY scope on ANY springer. I've tuned my 12 FPE TX to the nth degree partly for recoil management but also to ensure my scopes survive on my springers. I've head of 12 FPE springers destroying scopes (usually in the middle of a Field Target match, and scopes supposedly build for springer recoil).
I think this is potentially another way for the industry to mitigate some of the frustrations of some springer shooters. i.e. buying and trying different scopes, putting them on springers and praying that these scopes will survive these violent recoils for another shooting season.
I know some field target shooters would welcome the option of shooting a springer if it had the recoilless and accuracy attributes of a low to mid level PCP without the associated costs and accessories needed to power a PCP.
Thank you for reading this. I apologize as I can be long winded at times.
Not trying to change your mind. Just trying to widen springer horizon for others.
Seems like I saw somewhere in the initial chatter that a wood version of some type might be considered at some point but only the designer of the ZRS system could tell you for sure.I bought this rifle when it first came out. The zero recoil system works great. To test, I stacked/balanced 3 pellets vertically and set them on my scope elevation knob and fired. The stack of pellets was undisturbed by the firing cycle. Very very smooth.
The rifle was designed to be mated with a metal not wood stock.
My best pellet is JSB and/or AirArms 8.4. Mr Tom Gaylord blog posted JSB 7.3 as most accurate. I have not tried the 7.3's yet. My accuracy is the same as Mr. Gaylord's.