Taipan OG Veteran Tactical Stock

Got a tactical stock for the OG Vet in the mail this evening.

Just one possibility.
PXL_20231119_070500523.jpg



Surprisingly nice grain on the grip. If it wasn't for the
Screenshot_20231119-002224.png

being delivered on Tues I think I'd refinish the walnut grip and i believe it'd be quite striking. But for now the plan is the Royal Arms grip.
https://royalarms.com/shop/ar-1516-grip/

I liked these when they were first announced but not enough to pay the price they were asking, and DANG sure not enough to pay what a handful of the EURO retailers are still asking for it. But it came up on AGN classifieds here for a really good price and, in a rare-for-me impulse buy, I caved and bought it.

Some missing bolts, but shouldn't be a problem after a trip to the bins at the local hardware store. All in all its used, but not road-rashed, no threaded holes are stripped ("used, not abused") so I feel like I got a good deal.

First thoughts are that.....
1. I'm not sure I love the wooden cheek piece. It's just thick enough that I'd probably need to move to higher scope mounts, and don't really want to do that. 2. The UIT rail isn't standard, or at least isnt standard to my MAC1 hamster (there's some extra hardware in the above photo to make the knee riser attach).
3. Holy balls this thing is solid. The amount of aluminum in it is ridiculous. Just CHUNKS of billet. Not sure why they made it so sturdy, but it somehow makes one of the more sturdy air rifles that exist, EVEN MORE sturdy. The over -robust nature of the thing just screams TAIPAN.
4. It's heavy, see #3. Hefting the tactical stock in one hand and the laminate stock in the other.....let's just say no weight savings by going with the aluminum stock.
5. I like the foregrip, nice finger grooves. I also like that the adjustable pic rail within the UIT has delrin tips on the bolts that lock it in the preferred location. I've got a couple UIT rails on various guns and the inner track on all of them show wear and use. That won't happen on this one. Delrin tips = good!
6. This appears to be the version of the tactical stock that came with that foregrip instead of the knee riser? Not a problem, already have a knee riser and would have preferred foregrip anyway.
7. The adjustable "wings" on the buttplate are nice.
8. Adjustable lop, min is about 14 inches, max was something like 16.5.

Overall the verdict's still out. I'll get that Royal Arms grip on there and give it a fair shake, simply shooting it for awhile to decide if it's a keeper or not. The big hope is that it'll make the Vet platform easier to shoot offhand. I've never hated the laminate Vet stocks, just trying something else out for the fun of it. If it wins a permanent home, I may even swap some parts around and make a .20 Tactical Vet. (If that happens, wonder if my oldest son would notice the Vet Short he claimed somehow became a .177 or a .22 instead of a .20? 🤫) Or the tactical stock may even end up on my long range .22 Vet Long.

PXL_20231119_071242968.jpg

PXL_20231119_071254889.jpg

PXL_20231119_071224268.jpg
 
I think I saw that ad. I bought a 22 taipan from the same gentleman possibly. Tony is selling the new stocks on his site without all the pieces. I ordered a new 1 to try out and when I received it there was no knee riser. He will tell you he will refund you the price of the missing piece or you can wait until the next shipment. I'm assuming the next shipment will not have them either since yours most likely came from a prior shipment then the 1 I just ordered and neither yours or mine came with that piece. I'll be curious how you like it long term.
 
I bought the tac stock kit from TT minus the front knee as well. He threw in an extra Taipan .25 mag instead (y). It looks great, much nicer than the Vet 2 tactical IMO. I was surprised at how much heavier it got vs. the plain wood stock. I didn't think to measure before and after but offhand shooting was not made easier or more enjoyable for me, at least. The hooked butt stock and adjustable LoP is nice but not great for me. Having the ability to mount a bipod now is nice on the bench. The one piece I will keep installed no matter what is the wooden cheek piece! Not a fan of bare metal especially in the cooler weather. I'm thinking of going back to the original stock for giggles.
 
I bought the tac stock kit from TT minus the front knee as well. He threw in an extra Taipan .25 mag instead (y). It looks great, much nicer than the Vet 2 tactical IMO. I was surprised at how much heavier it got vs. the plain wood stock. I didn't think to measure before and after but offhand shooting was not made easier or more enjoyable for me, at least. The hooked butt stock and adjustable LoP is nice but not great for me. Having the ability to mount a bipod now is nice on the bench. The one piece I will keep installed no matter what is the wooden cheek piece! Not a fan of bare metal especially in the cooler weather. I'm thinking of going back to the original stock for giggles.

A lot of the weight is in that rear, hooked buttpad section. It's just much thicker than necessary. I think that Veterans are tough offhand because so much of the weight is to the rear. I'm pondering an alternative buttplate and have an idea that might work, and the idea would shift the balance of the gun forward. But before I put any time and effort into an alternative buttplate it I want to spend some time shooting with the tactical stock as-is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nealgl1985
A lot of the weight is in that rear, hooked buttpad section. It's just much thicker than necessary. I think that Veterans are tough offhand because so much of the weight is to the rear. I'm pondering an alternative buttplate and have an idea that might work, and the idea would shift the balance of the gun forward. But before I put any time and effort into an alternative buttplate it I want to spend some time shooting with the tactical stock as-is.
I look forward to seeing what you come up with for the buttplate. I temporarily grafted on a piece of a skeleton buffer tube style stock but ultimately put the original buttplate back on. My stock came with the articulating knee but not the forearm piece. I've considered refinishing the wood with a darker gray stain but it has not been a priority.

I added heat shrink to the adjustable wings, to protect them when standing the gun on its butt....

Perhaps this was a unique to me type of concern, but I did not like my breech floating unsecured above the rear of the stock. It flexed and vibrated. I added an M8 screw attaching the rear of the stock to the vacant m8 threaded hole in the rear of the breech. I used SS shim washers to take up the space between breech and stock. Now the rear of the stock is rock solid.

I found these UIT/Anschutz rail nuts that some may find useful.

1700426208590.png

https://www.shortactionprecision.com/products/b-t-anschutz-rail-nuts-bt28-n

I use it as a bench/slug gun so weight isn't necessarily a concern.

1700425914533.png
 
@Motorhead,

Royal Arms grip arrived a day early. I like the feel. It's heavier than I expected. Also it's hard plastic, I envisioned a rubbery sort of thing but I was wrong. And yes it's going to need modified to fit the standard AR grip on the Vet chassis stock, mostly the beavertail area.
PXL_20231121_060503573.jpg

As for fit, I don't feel like I have large hands, and I wouldn't want it any smaller. (Large hands are gonna feel crowded on here.)

Hopefully these photos help give you an idea.
PXL_20231121_055659249.jpgPXL_20231121_055720771.jpgPXL_20231121_055810075.jpgPXL_20231121_055828049.jpgPXL_20231121_060101520.PORTRAIT.jpgPXL_20231121_060134387.PORTRAIT.jpgPXL_20231121_060158846.PORTRAIT.jpg
 
The Royal Arms grip was a failure. The hole is simply not in the right place.

Ended up using a gift certificate i had for an ERGO 0 degree grip. AND decided to swap the stock onto my .20 Vet Short.

The difference between a Standard and Short Vet are of course the length of the air tube and barrel, but also the LOP is shorter on a Short, by about 1 inch. So that makes stock swaps not doable. And the trigger rod is the only thing that makes the LOP shorter. Ie trigger rod determines where the scope towers/air tube/barrel clamps are located, which determines which stock inletting fits. BUT I have a unique situation of needing a shorter LOP on the .177 Standard because it is the gun shot by my younger (smaller) son. The Shorty stock also weighs much less than the chassis stock.

Soooooo, I swapped air tube/barrel clamps from the .177 Standard to the .20 Short, and vice versa. This made the chassis stock fit the Vet Short. And while I call it the .20 Vet Short, it actually has a bit longer barrel than OEM, and also has one plenum extension. All of that together = this...
PXL_20231201_220234362.jpg


And the best part is that it keeps it 26.5" long, which allows it to fit in the little briefcase type rifle case this gun has lived in since 2018.
PXL_20231201_220939708.jpg


And the mirror of that is the .177 Standard, with the Shorty stock....
PXL_20231201_222247987.jpg


And next to each other, the perspective makes the difference in length seem more than it really is.
PXL_20231201_222904210.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: mackeral5