Snowpeak P35X Review

Recently found myself desiring a ‘powerful’ bullpup style .177. Looking around, I found I liked the look of the new P35X. Not too much info on this gun that isn’t limited to 12 fpe or translating. I am no stranger to the Snowpeak (and progeny) ‘barrel lottery.’ I just tell myself, fine, if it stinks I’ll re-barrel it. With the 65cc plenum and longer runway (~530 mm) I hoped to get 30 to 32 fpe. In artillery, barrels are sometimes listed as multiples of the caliber, making this a .177/118 where the .22 variant would be about .22/96. Why bring this up? Caliber relative to barrel length. My armchair calculations suggested that I could be getting around 30 fpe without a lot of pressure.

Back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, and springers were top shelf aspirations while MSPs were the norm, very strong performance in .177 was about 16 fpe. Even today springers exceeding 20 fpe in .177 are pretty uncommon. At the expected performance of about 30 fpe we’ll probably be looking for slugs in order to perform well. Maybe some of the super heavy (beyond 10.x gr) pellets will be alright. I did test JSB 10.3s for the first shots and they averaged just over 1050 fps, so yeah, heavier is likely a good idea.

The box arrived in good shape. The barrel needed the requisite cleaning, lots of crud in there. The wood grain is attractive on my example. I mounted a DNT ThermNight 225, a DonnyFL Yokozuna, and stuffed the foam from 3 foam hair curlers over the barrel in the shroud to slow the air coming back out the perforated shroud. It is stupidly quiet this way, the action is much louder to the ear than anything else in the shot cycle.

SPAP35Xb.jpg

SPAP35Xa.jpg

Turns out I get 29.2 fpe with JSB Beasts (16.2 gr) with the factory settings. So we’re close to 30 fpe. Seems the reg is right around 1750 psi on my example, so performance headroom on the regulator is there. As has been reported with the P35, P15, and variants the hammer spring seems to runs out of adjustability before the regulator maxes out. Mine was set with about 1/2 turn left of increasing preload before bottoming out. Since I wanted to see some high fpe, I maxed the hammer and then backed off a tiny bit.

With the JSB KO 13.43 slugs I get right at 60 shots before it falls off the regulator. Velocity just gracefully falls as we drop below the regulator pressure. So 5 magazines before we need a refill.

Below is listed the projectile weight versus energy for pellets (average of 11 shots/1 magazine).

Weight Energy Projectile


10.3 24.63 FX Pellet


13.4 27.38 FX Pellet


15.42 27.99 Gamo G-Hammer


15.74 28.26 H&N Rabbit Magnum II


16.1 28.39 Seneca Domes


16.2 29.17 JSB Beast

The Seneca Domes were the most accurate with this tune, though the Beasts and Rabbit Magnum II were very acceptable.

Below is listed the projectile weight versus energy for slugs (average of 11 shots/1 magazine).

Weight Energy Projectile


13 27.03 Zan


13.43 26.73 JSB KO


15 25.78 NSA


16 27.14 H&N


16 27.72 Zan


18 26.13 Wildman


20 26.88 H&N


20 26.51 Zan

The JSB KOs shot very well. However, the H&N 20gr really shined. The first 4 shots all went through a barely enlarging hole and the following 7 whittled that hole a bit bigger except one shot that wandered just enough to oblong the hole - probably me. Shooting at 25 yards has me shooting sub-sub dime sized 11 shot groups for everything but the 15gr NSAs, it appears this barrel does not get along with those slugs, at least with this tune. In my experience with SPA barrels, they tend to like either the super-light or super-heavy stuff. Someday I’ll write up my experiences with my loveably schizophrenic Notos.
H&N20&NSA15.JPG

In the graph you can clearly see the slug weight versus energy curve is significantly behind the pellets. I conclude from the chart that we’re best off if we have projectiles in the 16gr range. Sometime this winter I’ll open it up and see if I can get that 32fpe with 16gr at around 950.

Projowtvsenergy.png
 
Recently found myself desiring a ‘powerful’ bullpup style .177. Looking around, I found I liked the look of the new P35X. Not too much info on this gun that isn’t limited to 12 fpe or translating. I am no stranger to the Snowpeak (and progeny) ‘barrel lottery.’ I just tell myself, fine, if it stinks I’ll re-barrel it. With the 65cc plenum and longer runway (~530 mm) I hoped to get 30 to 32 fpe. In artillery, barrels are sometimes listed as multiples of the caliber, making this a .177/118 where the .22 variant would be about .22/96. Why bring this up? Caliber relative to barrel length. My armchair calculations suggested that I could be getting around 30 fpe without a lot of pressure.

Back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, and springers were top shelf aspirations while MSPs were the norm, very strong performance in .177 was about 16 fpe. Even today springers exceeding 20 fpe in .177 are pretty uncommon. At the expected performance of about 30 fpe we’ll probably be looking for slugs in order to perform well. Maybe some of the super heavy (beyond 10.x gr) pellets will be alright. I did test JSB 10.3s for the first shots and they averaged just over 1050 fps, so yeah, heavier is likely a good idea.

The box arrived in good shape. The barrel needed the requisite cleaning, lots of crud in there. The wood grain is attractive on my example. I mounted a DNT ThermNight 225, a DonnyFL Yokozuna, and stuffed the foam from 3 foam hair curlers over the barrel in the shroud to slow the air coming back out the perforated shroud. It is stupidly quiet this way, the action is much louder to the ear than anything else in the shot cycle.

View attachment 509580
View attachment 509585
Turns out I get 29.2 fpe with JSB Beasts (16.2 gr) with the factory settings. So we’re close to 30 fpe. Seems the reg is right around 1750 psi on my example, so performance headroom on the regulator is there. As has been reported with the P35, P15, and variants the hammer spring seems to runs out of adjustability before the regulator maxes out. Mine was set with about 1/2 turn left of increasing preload before bottoming out. Since I wanted to see some high fpe, I maxed the hammer and then backed off a tiny bit.

With the JSB KO 13.43 slugs I get right at 60 shots before it falls off the regulator. Velocity just gracefully falls as we drop below the regulator pressure. So 5 magazines before we need a refill.

Below is listed the projectile weight versus energy for pellets (average of 11 shots/1 magazine).

Weight Energy Projectile


10.3 24.63 FX Pellet


13.4 27.38 FX Pellet


15.42 27.99 Gamo G-Hammer


15.74 28.26 H&N Rabbit Magnum II


16.1 28.39 Seneca Domes


16.2 29.17 JSB Beast

The Seneca Domes were the most accurate with this tune, though the Beasts and Rabbit Magnum II were very acceptable.

Below is listed the projectile weight versus energy for slugs (average of 11 shots/1 magazine).

Weight Energy Projectile


13 27.03 Zan


13.43 26.73 JSB KO


15 25.78 NSA


16 27.14 H&N


16 27.72 Zan


18 26.13 Wildman


20 26.88 H&N


20 26.51 Zan

The JSB KOs shot very well. However, the H&N 20gr really shined. The first 4 shots all went through a barely enlarging hole and the following 7 whittled that hole a bit bigger except one shot that wandered just enough to oblong the hole - probably me. Shooting at 25 yards has me shooting sub-sub dime sized 11 shot groups for everything but the 15gr NSAs, it appears this barrel does not get along with those slugs, at least with this tune. In my experience with SPA barrels, they tend to like either the super-light or super-heavy stuff. Someday I’ll write up my experiences with my loveably schizophrenic Notos.
View attachment 509583
In the graph you can clearly see the slug weight versus energy curve is significantly behind the pellets. I conclude from the chart that we’re best off if we have projectiles in the 16gr range. Sometime this winter I’ll open it up and see if I can get that 32fpe with 16gr at around 950.

View attachment 509582
This is awesome! Thank you for the write up!

@Scotay42
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scotay42
Thanks for a nice review. If you find you need more hammer spring you can shim the hammer spring for another turn or a little more worth. I have my P35-25 working that way and I'm assuming it will work on the P35X. I drilled out a washer, I think it was a #10 to go over the rod on the spring adjuster and then used a few shims made from an old soda can to add a little more. On my 25 caliber I have it at 45-48 fpe doing this with an aftermarket plenum which is less than half the one on the P35X. But really it seems like you are at a pretty high power level for a 177 now.

I have 3 P35s and they are all pretty accurate. I like to shoot 30 yard challenge targets and the 22 has given me one 200 score. The 177's best is a 197 and the 25 has produced a 194. The 25 is a year older than the 22 and 177.

If your fill probe leaks sometimes (like all mine do) Alliexpress has a replacement for less than $4 that probably will not leak. I have 4 and they all work great.

If you have not already I would reduce the first stage spring pressure. You can also reduce the sear engagement but be careful if you do, you can make the gun go off on it's own.
 
Recently found myself desiring a ‘powerful’ bullpup style .177. Looking around, I found I liked the look of the new P35X. Not too much info on this gun that isn’t limited to 12 fpe or translating. I am no stranger to the Snowpeak (and progeny) ‘barrel lottery.’ I just tell myself, fine, if it stinks I’ll re-barrel it. With the 65cc plenum and longer runway (~530 mm) I hoped to get 30 to 32 fpe. In artillery, barrels are sometimes listed as multiples of the caliber, making this a .177/118 where the .22 variant would be about .22/96. Why bring this up? Caliber relative to barrel length. My armchair calculations suggested that I could be getting around 30 fpe without a lot of pressure.

Back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, and springers were top shelf aspirations while MSPs were the norm, very strong performance in .177 was about 16 fpe. Even today springers exceeding 20 fpe in .177 are pretty uncommon. At the expected performance of about 30 fpe we’ll probably be looking for slugs in order to perform well. Maybe some of the super heavy (beyond 10.x gr) pellets will be alright. I did test JSB 10.3s for the first shots and they averaged just over 1050 fps, so yeah, heavier is likely a good idea.

The box arrived in good shape. The barrel needed the requisite cleaning, lots of crud in there. The wood grain is attractive on my example. I mounted a DNT ThermNight 225, a DonnyFL Yokozuna, and stuffed the foam from 3 foam hair curlers over the barrel in the shroud to slow the air coming back out the perforated shroud. It is stupidly quiet this way, the action is much louder to the ear than anything else in the shot cycle.

View attachment 509580
View attachment 509585
Turns out I get 29.2 fpe with JSB Beasts (16.2 gr) with the factory settings. So we’re close to 30 fpe. Seems the reg is right around 1750 psi on my example, so performance headroom on the regulator is there. As has been reported with the P35, P15, and variants the hammer spring seems to runs out of adjustability before the regulator maxes out. Mine was set with about 1/2 turn left of increasing preload before bottoming out. Since I wanted to see some high fpe, I maxed the hammer and then backed off a tiny bit.

With the JSB KO 13.43 slugs I get right at 60 shots before it falls off the regulator. Velocity just gracefully falls as we drop below the regulator pressure. So 5 magazines before we need a refill.

Below is listed the projectile weight versus energy for pellets (average of 11 shots/1 magazine).

Weight Energy Projectile


10.3 24.63 FX Pellet


13.4 27.38 FX Pellet


15.42 27.99 Gamo G-Hammer


15.74 28.26 H&N Rabbit Magnum II


16.1 28.39 Seneca Domes


16.2 29.17 JSB Beast

The Seneca Domes were the most accurate with this tune, though the Beasts and Rabbit Magnum II were very acceptable.

Below is listed the projectile weight versus energy for slugs (average of 11 shots/1 magazine).

Weight Energy Projectile


13 27.03 Zan


13.43 26.73 JSB KO


15 25.78 NSA


16 27.14 H&N


16 27.72 Zan


18 26.13 Wildman


20 26.88 H&N


20 26.51 Zan

The JSB KOs shot very well. However, the H&N 20gr really shined. The first 4 shots all went through a barely enlarging hole and the following 7 whittled that hole a bit bigger except one shot that wandered just enough to oblong the hole - probably me. Shooting at 25 yards has me shooting sub-sub dime sized 11 shot groups for everything but the 15gr NSAs, it appears this barrel does not get along with those slugs, at least with this tune. In my experience with SPA barrels, they tend to like either the super-light or super-heavy stuff. Someday I’ll write up my experiences with my loveably schizophrenic Notos.
View attachment 509583
In the graph you can clearly see the slug weight versus energy curve is significantly behind the pellets. I conclude from the chart that we’re best off if we have projectiles in the 16gr range. Sometime this winter I’ll open it up and see if I can get that 32fpe with 16gr at around 950.

View attachment 509582
What dealer did you purchase from ?-
thanks in advance
 
Silverstreak, I bought the gun through Krale, shipping was fast, I think four days.

Have SPA tightened up QC, or changed manufacturing methods recently? It is entirely possible. Am I being unfair to SPA, perhaps. I believe SPA-made guns are pretty great guns for those handy with a few skills. This barrel seems very uniform in resistance until the final 2 inches, where it chokes very abruptly. I'd rather a more gentle ramp to the choke, but precision is hard to argue with, so Perle is entirely correct.

JimD, thank you for the info, your posts were one of the things I studied before making my order. I intend to try for a bit more power from a couple angles. Shimming the preload on the hammer side, along with bumping up regulator pressure, and polishing anything that seems to be wearing or needs it. We'll see where it winds up after these relatively easy steps.
 
Thanks for a nice review. If you find you need more hammer spring you can shim the hammer spring for another turn or a little more worth. I have my P35-25 working that way and I'm assuming it will work on the P35X. I drilled out a washer, I think it was a #10 to go over the rod on the spring adjuster and then used a few shims made from an old soda can to add a little more. On my 25 caliber I have it at 45-48 fpe doing this with an aftermarket plenum which is less than half the one on the P35X. But really it seems like you are at a pretty high power level for a 177 now.

I have 3 P35s and they are all pretty accurate. I like to shoot 30 yard challenge targets and the 22 has given me one 200 score. The 177's best is a 197 and the 25 has produced a 194. The 25 is a year older than the 22 and 177.

If your fill probe leaks sometimes (like all mine do) Alliexpress has a replacement for less than $4 that probably will not leak. I have 4 and they all work great.

If you have not already I would reduce the first stage spring pressure. You can also reduce the sear engagement but be careful if you do, you can make the gun go off on it's own.
Notos fill probe works on the stoeger btw