• Please consider adding your "Event" to the Calendar located on our Home page!

Planning for Extreme FT - Looking for guidance on reasonable target difficulties

Mike: Does “soles of feet must be touching the ground” exclude shooting prone?

Podna
At XFT in AZ, yes. In EFT GP series, no. Some set local rules like in OR where barrel must be at least 15 inches off the ground so no prone or pretzel there. In TX and UT prone is allowed as long as bipod not attached and you can see the target from that low.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Podna
At XFT in AZ, yes. In EFT GP series, no. Some set local rules like in OR where barrel must be at least 15 inches off the ground so no prone or pretzel there. In TX and UT prone is allowed as long as bipod not attached and you can see the target from that low.
ha! prone may have been allowed in Utah at their only match so far but wouldn't have helped anybody. Good percentage of the targets weren't addressable from standard seated/bipod position. Lots of standing shots, BUT they at least provided long/standing shooting sticks.

And that's not a gripe. I thought it was a very different and cool course. Shooters had to be very careful shooting through the tops of all that brush in the pellets path. Having varied and unique courses is a big part of the fun of field target for me, both extreme and regular.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Centercut
ha! prone may have been allowed in Utah at their only match so far but wouldn't have helped anybody. Good percentage of the targets weren't addressable from standard seated/bipod position. Lots of standing shots, BUT they at least provided long/standing shooting sticks.
Exactly. At TexTreme all but one lane targets are accessible prone. I plan to shoot that course prone in the June EFT GP event. Like Cole said very few targets in UT were accessible prone, same at EBR EFT GP finale.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Podna
Exactly. At TexTreme all but one lane targets are accessible prone. I plan to shoot that course probe in the June EFT GP event. Like Cole said very few targets in UT were accessible prone, same at EBR EFT GP finale.
Ron got chiggers there in Texas? :D

I grew up in southeastern Oklahoma. Nobody lays on the ground in chigger country unless they're unconscious and got there by accident.
 
Ron got chiggers there in Texas? :D

I grew up in southeastern Oklahoma. Nobody lays on the ground in chigger country unless they're unconscious and got there by accident.
Ron has chiggers like Alaska has mosquitoes! I had chigger bites from the tops of my feet to the backs of my ears after the June match this year.
 
If you need targets that will hold up to 108fpe even at 25 yds contact Nofilters or me as we make and use them in our Phoenix matches. They set up with ease and will withstand subsonic 22 rimfire.
We have used ours for over 2 years and have had no target failures.

View attachment 314727

View attachment 314728

View attachment 314729

View attachment 314730
As the other S in S&S, I can tell you these targets can be used for 12ftlbs @57 yards as was tested and proven by Peykan at the Oct,5th night match. So if any club is looking for versatile targets that can be used for AAFTA or XFT. These are it. They have been in use for 2 years and in the elements for the same time. We are shooting 100Ftlbs at them and have not even had to flip a reducer. The Reducers and face plates are symmetrical. This means that both could be flipped over IF they ever got so dented. The mechanism is assembled with interlocking slots. This makes for flush welds and stronger end results. The reducers make these targets so versatile at any distance. The reducers are threaded not the faceplate. This means the reducers can be put on the front of the faceplate per AAFTA rules. They also will bolt on the back of the faceplate. We also use shoulder bolts at all pivoting and slide locations for ease of operation. This makes the targets very consistent on HOLDING a set point and makes them pull up super easy. Call either one of us or check the website www.azxft.com
 
Exactly. At TexTreme all but one lane targets are accessible prone. I plan to shoot that course probe in the June EFT GP event. Like Cole said very few targets in UT were accessible prone, same at EBR EFT GP finale.
Prone is just like shooting off-hand with sticks. Some people don't want to practice from seat and Bipod. I think my rules have proven the best shooter wins EVERY time, not the best equipment or someone that can get an advantage because they are more flexible than the avg shooter in the field. If everyone has to do the same position it levels the playing field. EVERYONE can shoot from a bucket and bipod. Not everyone can lay prone with a bipod. IMO prone is way more stable than bucket or seat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Centercut
So as I have said repeatedly if all the clubs have different rules. Then the point system for the GP is in question because Prone is been proven to be easier than bucket and sticks at Phoenix. So, if someone wins 1st prone at another event do they deserve all the points that 1st place wins at a more difficult venue? I stated my concern about both the consistency and "perception is reality"issues many times in the few zoom meetings that I attended and it fell on deaf ears. So I quit attending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sturkis
So as I have said repeatedly if all the clubs have different rules. Then the point system for the GP is in question because Prone is been proven to be easier than bucket and sticks at Phoenix. So, if someone wins 1st prone at another event do they deserve all the points that 1st place wins at a more difficult venue? I stated my concern about both the consistency and "perception is reality"issues many times in the few zoom meetings that I attended and it fell on deaf ears. So I quit attending.
I'd hope that if somebody cleans house from prone in Utah or Texas, a change of rules occurs in the direction of the standardization that you're talking about. Of course Ron seems to be a wily one, and now that Centercut has announced his intentions, Ron may have some tricks up his sleeve. With the extreme FT final match at EBR, the cactus and terrain make prone a moot point.
 
Ok, so Ron makes it so a few of the lanes are not visible-prone. So Centercut just shoots those from sitting with a bipod. Then he goes on to win what then?
Well he would win the title of "Winner of Most Chiggers Acquired in Uncomfortable Locations at Textreme 2023." Hehe.

On a more serious note, I agree that positional rules need to be standardized for all the reasons that were so heatedly discussed that first winter after you single-handedly turned extreme field target into something much bigger than just once a year event at EBR.
 
Ok, so Ron makes it so a few of the lanes are not visible-prone. So Centercut just shoots those from sitting with a bipod. Then he goes on to win what then?
Ben, yes, I get that. I can't remember, but bum bags are allowed at XFT, correct? As long as the soles of both feet are on the ground...? On one hand, the same position for everyone seems fair, but on the other hand it doesn't simulate hunting where various positions might be used depending on the situation presented.
I was thinking how much EFT/XFT has improved on AAFTA rules and fairness. With AAFTA, shooters are still allowed the low positions (like pretzel) and the soles of their feet don't need to be in touch with the ground. Shooters can even shoot prone as long as the hand on the butt doesn't directly touch the ground and the bipod isn't attached to the gun.
One thing we certainly don't want is a high-power clone of AAFTA...

Cole, I've already ordered a case of Deep Woods off for the TexTreme event... :ROFLMAO:
 
yes, bum bag is a form of seat and soles of feet in the ground.
The only reason I asked is that when sitting on a bum bag, the shooter can rest the butt of his stock on his knee, with the fore end on a bipod, which is a position most can't get into, kinda like prone in a way as far as "fairness"... A couple guys in TX shoot that way, and in the most recent TexTreme EFT event the 1st and 2nd places shot in that ultra-stable position. That's what got me thinking of prone, since what's good for the goose...
 
The only reason I asked is that when sitting on a bum bag, the shooter can rest the butt of his stock on his knee, with the fore end on a bipod, which is a position most can't get into, kinda like prone in a way as far as "fairness"... A couple guys in TX shoot that way, and in the most recent TexTreme EFT event the 1st and 2nd places shot in that ultra-stable position. That's what got me thinking of prone, since what's good for the goose...
wait wait wait. During all the XFT positional debates, I got ridiculed for suggesting that a bumbag might be a more stable position and therefore offer an advantage. More than one self-proclaimed expert with lots of "experience" saying no benefit from a bumbag. Ahhh this is a good memory.

Perhaps there were some ulterior motives going on in all that discussion?!? My wife tells me all the time that I'm too cynical and generally don't think very highly of the human condition. And then I get reassurances like this one of what a self-serving bunch of #@$@# we humans are. Classic.

Yes, another perfect example of why positional limitations/restrictions are NECESSARY. Bucket or stool and bipod or sticks. That's it. Everybody can shoot from that position so it is, again, the most equitable. Fair is fair, except for when somebody is making rules to benefit themselves.
 
Last edited: