So, you didn't read the attachments then?
Denying truth is not the same as truth being false. Hydro testing was designed a hundred years ago for steel pressure vessels.
Along came aluminum pressure vessels and they also were hydro tested.
Both are dynamic materials, both expand then contract if safe pressures are maintained. The ONLY inspection other than visual is failure under test pressure when using hydrostatic testing.
Still following me?
Along came carbon fiber, not understanding the static and non dynamic nature of carbon fibers, they used hydrostatic testing on CF vessels but failures would become apparent over time and the 15 year lifespan was established.
The United States Navy wanted to extend the service life of thier CF tanks so in conducting studies (posted) it was determined that it was hydrostatic testing that was damaging the fibers thus shortening the life's of the CF tanks.
Investigations were conducted, hydrostatic testing was found to be the primary cause of hydrostatic testing failure so they looked for alternatives to hydrostatic testing.
Ultrasonic testing was tested and found to be superior in every way, new bottles with 30 year labels were created, they are not allowed to be hydrostatic tested, only Ultrasonic testing can be used on them.
These bottles are now available on the open market for firefighting and the United States Navy now uses them on all thier vessels as the 15 year bottles time out.