No idea what the Daisy is based on or what kind of seal it uses. I have shot it at 30 yards and have no problem hitting the reset paddle on my metal squirrel target (off a rest). Reset paddle is about the size of a golf ball. Keep in mind I’m doing this with open sights and my old eyes. If you throw a good scope and mount on there you could consistently reach out even further.
I have no issue with the trigger. It’s not a match trigger by any means, but it doesn’t stick and the break is predictable. Some might think it’s heavy, I purposely did not modify the trigger because I’m teaching my son the fundamentals so he’s not reliant on how a weapon is configured to be a good shooter.
So back to my comparison to the Crosman Phantom Hunter NP. The power plant is basically the same as the Crosman Vantage NP, Fury NP, Shockwave NP (the only difference is the stock). It’s exacly the same as the Crosman Stealth NP. Anyway the Phantom Hunter NP pushes the same pellet at 1000 FPS (only 50 FPS faster than the Daisy) and is at least three times harder to cock. The open sights on the Phantom (aka Steath) are complete crap mainly due to how the buttstock gets in the way with your cheek weld when trying to line them up (for me anyway). It’s not a rifle I would want to shoot with open sights because they do not align naturally when the rifle is brought to the high ready. The trigger is terrible as compared to my Daisy because it does stick at multiple locations before the break. The Daisy also shoots tighter groups with open sights, but this could be due to the terrible scope that comes with the Crosman. I say the scope because everything is locked down tight and it’s definitely not me. If it’s not the scope, then it’s the barrel. I have not had an opportunity to change scopes to see if the Phantom performs any better.
For under $70 the Daisy is a very solid performer, it’s well built, and will perform up to ones abilities.
I have no issue with the trigger. It’s not a match trigger by any means, but it doesn’t stick and the break is predictable. Some might think it’s heavy, I purposely did not modify the trigger because I’m teaching my son the fundamentals so he’s not reliant on how a weapon is configured to be a good shooter.
So back to my comparison to the Crosman Phantom Hunter NP. The power plant is basically the same as the Crosman Vantage NP, Fury NP, Shockwave NP (the only difference is the stock). It’s exacly the same as the Crosman Stealth NP. Anyway the Phantom Hunter NP pushes the same pellet at 1000 FPS (only 50 FPS faster than the Daisy) and is at least three times harder to cock. The open sights on the Phantom (aka Steath) are complete crap mainly due to how the buttstock gets in the way with your cheek weld when trying to line them up (for me anyway). It’s not a rifle I would want to shoot with open sights because they do not align naturally when the rifle is brought to the high ready. The trigger is terrible as compared to my Daisy because it does stick at multiple locations before the break. The Daisy also shoots tighter groups with open sights, but this could be due to the terrible scope that comes with the Crosman. I say the scope because everything is locked down tight and it’s definitely not me. If it’s not the scope, then it’s the barrel. I have not had an opportunity to change scopes to see if the Phantom performs any better.
For under $70 the Daisy is a very solid performer, it’s well built, and will perform up to ones abilities.
Upvote 0