After a year of shooting Air Arms Field Heavy (10.3 grain) and Air Arms Field (8.4 grain) pellets I decided to revisit pellet performance from other makers. Note every rifle handles shooting pellets differently so your results may differ.
I am shooting a TX200 MIII in .177 with a Vortex Diamondback 6-24x50mm scope. I am shooting from a bench with from an Allen rest with Protektor bags. There was little to no wind, no mirage and about 78 degrees Fahrenheit.
Here 2 types of H&N pellets were tested. The H&N FT 9.57 grain (4.50mm) and H&N Baracuda Match 10.65 (4.51mm). Their performance was compared to the AA 10.3 (4.52mm) pellets that I regularly use. In this instance the H&N 9.57 provided solid accuracy compared to AA 10.3 but shot slower and with more trajectory. Future testing with H&N 9.57 is suggested.





I am shooting a TX200 MIII in .177 with a Vortex Diamondback 6-24x50mm scope. I am shooting from a bench with from an Allen rest with Protektor bags. There was little to no wind, no mirage and about 78 degrees Fahrenheit.
Here 2 types of H&N pellets were tested. The H&N FT 9.57 grain (4.50mm) and H&N Baracuda Match 10.65 (4.51mm). Their performance was compared to the AA 10.3 (4.52mm) pellets that I regularly use. In this instance the H&N 9.57 provided solid accuracy compared to AA 10.3 but shot slower and with more trajectory. Future testing with H&N 9.57 is suggested.





Last edited: