Scopes can easily be damaged even without shimming if scope rings aren't lapped wjenever needed even when using expensive rings.
Over the last 50 years I have seen many scopes with ring marks or damage. The odd thing is I have mounted hundreds of scopes. When young I used the cheapest I could buy and considered myself lucky to get that. I have shimmed a bunch of scopes also because that’s all I could do. Anyway I have never had one scope with ring marks. Is tightening everything even a key? Keeping all the ring gaps equal instead of cranking down on on side or one ring. I don’t know. I had some heavy recoiling contender pistols in rifle calibers and could not leave anything loose. No lessons hear, just wonder.
To me, this may be the key issue and it doesn't in any way seem to be something one can "calibrate". Shimming would by necessity seem to decrease overall surface area contact with the upper part of a ring that is shimmed below and both upper and lower parts of the other ring. How much does one tighten to avoid movement? Can it work? Absolutely. But I also have seen ring damage on scopes that weren't in shimmed rings. So shimming is not something that I want to do. Others may do so successfully. If it works for you then by all means do it.
Upvote 0