As always. Chippas with the KEWEL toys.Here's my R10 carbine in .177 Custom JM stock. Love this springer!!!
View attachment 520917
View attachment 520918
To be clear, what maximum length is still considered a carbine-sized barrel on an airgun? Sixteen inches? Fourteen?Oh yeah, the Webley Tomahawks are carbine length barrels
.25
.22
To be clear, what maximum length is still considered a carbine-sized barrel on an airgun? Sixteen inches? Fourteen?
It was a general question about the maximum standard length of carbine barrels. Not directed at the guns you posted.IDK
They're 13 1/2
It was a general question about the maximum standard length of carbine barrels. Not directed at the guns you posted.
For instance, a TX200 MK3 standard length barrel is specified as being 13.19", which I would consider carbine length, yet there is a factory designated carbine version of that gun which has only a slightly shorter barrel. So it seems like there's a grey area when we talk about carbine guns unless the factory states "this is the standard version and this is a carbine version."
I know! How about you or Mike start a custom stock picture thread? Imagine the eye candy out there! I can’t take that lead as I only own standard stock Airguns.Here's my R10 carbine in .177 Custom JM stock. Love this springer!!!
View attachment 520917
View attachment 520918
+1 on the C1! Designed from the ground up as a true carbine, built around the classic Webley Vulcan powerplant.Beeman C1 in .22 flavor
View attachment 520864
The .22 C1 is right at 11.5fpe. I put an old Bushnell Sportview on it. It'll light up the 1 1/2" spinners at 36yrds or any squirrels that step into the perimeter. LOL+1 on the C1! Designed from the ground up as a true carbine, built around the classic Webley Vulcan powerplant.
Plenty of power (last one I had went over 900 FPS with .177 Hobbys), a very "quick" action, and the straight-line stock controls recoil movement well. I've had a couple and found them surprisingly easy to shoot accurately, in spite of the fact that the grip geometry is quite uncomfortable for me.
Back off the trigger spring set screw on the C1 until the creep goes away. You might be able to go a little further. Then they’re not too bad. Just make sure it won’t bump fire. It’s a single stage.The .22 C1 is right at 11.5fpe. I put an old Bushnell Sportview on it. It'll light up the 1 1/2" spinners at 36yrds or any squirrels that step into the perimeter. LOL
Only thing I dislike about that gun and the spitfire are the horrendous triggers.
Mike+1 on the C1! Designed from the ground up as a true carbine, built around the classic Webley Vulcan powerplant.
Plenty of power (last one I had went over 900 FPS with .177 Hobbys), a very "quick" action, and the straight-line stock controls recoil movement well. I've had a couple and found them surprisingly easy to shoot accurately, in spite of the fact that the grip geometry is quite uncomfortable for me.
That's a pretty cool set up, is it just as accurate as before? Also why is the action so high in the stock?Here's my uber carbine -- HW977UK (Uber Karbine - not factory designation) that's 37.5" OAL. It's a 97k with the muzzlebrake removed, a 77k front unit added, and shortened cocking lever. The stock is by an unknown maker.
View attachment 520866
Thanks...it actually didn't lose any accuracy since I didn't chop the barrel. The muzzle brake extends about 3" ahead of the end of the barrel, so removing it reduced the OAL by that much, which was the perfect for the OAL desired.That's a pretty cool set up, is it just as accurate as before? Also why is the action so high in the stock?