O.07" group?? Looks like a .7" group.Wasn’t sure if I should post this or let them, but here is a pretty good quick review of the Epoch in the hands of a 3rd party, Joe Polanco. Received it this morning.
View attachment 299154
When I read it, I had the same thought. Definitely typo.O.07" group?? Looks like a .7" group.
The link doesn't work
I wonder why it wasn’t at EBR? I can only guess it’s not as far along in development as we are led to believe? Looks like they have until June to show something and compete at RMAC in 100Y BR and PRS. We’ll see.
@ BFLOYD- Ball scratching? Answer emails? Bro, what’s your keyboard look like? When you press G does the J appear instead?My concern at this point is them not reacting to this thread????
Say something, good, bad, or indifferent at this point.
My other concern is i actually sent them an email last week with no response to this point either.
I get it as a small business owner, we are busy, but I sit down every morning after 2 cups of coffee, and a good ball scratching, to answer the previous days emails.
Hey Floyd, must be something wrong with the e-mails. Check your spam or junk mail dated September 28th at 10:30 am. Hope this helps.~Darryl@ BFLOYD- Ball scratching? Answer emails? Bro, what’s your keyboard look like? When you press G does the J appear instead?
Just funning with ya
There was never any real question about competing in 2022. As indicated in the Shot Show 2022 video, the preproduction model was not scheduled for testing until September. Personally I was quite surprised when Skout was actually able to meet that projection. If all continues to go as planned, you can be sure that the Epoch will be in the mix in 2023.I wonder why it wasn’t at EBR? I can only guess it’s not as far along in development as we are led to believe? Looks like they could easily compete in minor events like an N50 competition anytime, or have until June to show something and compete in a major event like RMAC in 100Y BR and PRS. We’ll see.
I’m pretty sure my own personal troll will soon reply to say how 100Y pellet BR is just luck….
You've overlooked the fact that the valve design is currently, and has been patented for many years. I' quiet sure if any major manufacturer could have used it before , they would certainly have done so. As I understand it, the tech (the functional design as it stands) must be licensed by Adam Gardener or one of his subsidiary companies. If I'm correct (and of course I am) this explains why it has remained exclusive. While there have been hammerless air rifles in the past, none have employed this particular valve design. I'm confident that you will see the design licensing and it's subsequent use by other manufacturers in the future.I see a lot of old school airgunners (paintballers) so thrilled about this rifle saying its going to completely change the airgun world, if it does for the better thats awesome! However, why haven't Daystate or FX used spool valves instead of hammer and spring ? I think if it was so promising and the techs been out there (in paintball rifles) someone would have done it.