It’s a matter of calculable physics. No…it won’t matter much in a perceptible way. The recoil is likely from the muzzle blast. I doubt the valve “recoil “even amounts to 1/2 fpe.
Upvote 0
Inertia v setback is mechanical mass in motion in nature and math is calculable but recoil created by air escaping the muzzle is? Research required… come on physics peeps jump in.@thomasairWhat about the hammer weight that’s traveling the opposite direction, it is a weight slamming into a valve to open it. Wouldn’t that take from the primary recoil? No hammer, more felt recoil?
what drove your caliber choice?Picking up mine TODAY ....
i have the .177 and will share as i know more.This speaks volumes of Skout to me.
Granted Scott knows his way around air rifles but still. I also realize it is a symbiotic relationship, to have someone knowledgeable tinker with your rifles for refinements, a beta tester of sorts, but they seem far more responsive than another AG company with an all electronic gun (yes I do own one).
I have little need for a .30, but a .25 with a .177 would be just perfect for me. Waiting and watching the progress being made.
Thank you all for this elequent and informative discussion.
Inertia v setback is mechanical mass in motion in nature and math is calculable but recoil created by air escaping the muzzle is? Research required… come on physics peeps jump in.@thomasair
Can't wait to hear more about the .177! I'll be looking for a barrel kit as soon as they are available.i have the .177 and will share as i know more.
ONLY available in .30 at the time ... Waiting on .22 cal conversion partswhat drove your caliber choice?
95% of my airgunning is suburbia backyard piddlin, or FT related so i chose the .177 = I don't think there are many of these tiny tots in play yet.
Of note, on my caliber choice, I Ran into some magazine feed issues; but Skout is "on it" and in just two days they are already sending two new magazines for me to try.
I think some airgunners, like me, are like damn gerbils ... next shiny thing catches their eye.
ONLY available in .30 at the time ... Waiting on .22 cal conversion parts
Well, I actually had a prototype.22 in my hands at Skout, so hopefully it proves out and they become available soon.VERY Nice !!!
Not shot the EPOCH in a couple months ... really no need for .30 and unwilling to shell out the $$$ in cost for giggles plinking .. so we wait
You can probably simplify recoil on the energy blast by the dwell of the pellet inside the barrel. A short barrel making 60 fpe with 1 ms dwell will have a 1ms long recoil @ that energy, a barrel with 4 ms dwell will have the recoil last for 4 ms @ that energy.
How to convert the above to momentum...
Lets say the above was done with a 33.95 grain pellet @ 880 fps.
Momentum = mass × velocity
33.9 grains × 0.00006479891 pounds/grain ≈ 0.0021947 pounds
Momentum ≈ 0.0021947 pounds × 880 fps ≈ 1.93304 pound-feet per second (lb-ft/s)
Inertia is...
Inertia = mass × velocity^2
Inertia ≈ 1703.41 pound-feet squared per second squared (lb-ft^2/s^2)
So your exposure to the above inertia that is felt, is based on the exposure time (dwell time) of the pellet in the barrel.
-Matt
That’s not how that works at all.
A 20 fpe gun with a 30” barrel will have much less felt recoil than a 20fpe gun with a 4” barrel. This is simply due to the greater secondary recoil from the muzzle blast. The primary recoil will be the same. Getting a pellet up to a particular speed in a shorter barrel will create more secondary recoil than a long one.
As a person that makes some 13” barreled 20fpe guns and 24” barreled 20fpe guns….this is not something that can be contested by numbers. It’s readily obvious to anyone that shoots them both.
Mike
Feeling longer results in less felt recoil. It’s the very principle that makes recoil absorption devices in artillery function. Spread the recoil over a longer time and it feels less.