Skout EVO shipping now!

When will a semi/full auto and 3 shot burst Skout be available? We all know you can do it. Don't pretend you can't!
They definitely can. I wasn’t expecting them to actually respond that they will be making a semi/full-auto variant. They probably want to avoid the Osborne effect or they might have internal reasons for not wanting to do it at all. I just wanted to reassure them that there is demand for this type of variant.

The best we could have reasonably hoped for was a vague emoji response.

2/3 shot burst would be awesome, and shouldn’t be much harder than semi/full once they have the mechanics in place for semi/full. It will most likely be primarily a software implementation to add the burst mode(s) I think.
 
Give Skout a break, along with a big hand! Think about how far they’ve come in just a couple of years. They are out there competing in this market with manufacturers of PCP’s that have been around a long @$$ time. One of these long time company’s that I’m a big fan boy of, just released its fourth generation gun and the majority of comments I see are a bunch of Ho Hum’s and yawns.

Skout, in the pace they are going, will be on the top. It takes time, and they’ll get there. If you look at the recent RMAC finals, there were three finalists with the Skouts, and making the finals at RMAC is a feat indeed. That’s actually really really awesome for a company who just got into the airgun/pcp market just two years ago.

In time, a lighter hunting model will come. In time a good field target version will come. In time a big bore, and some day just a value priced plinker model.

Oh, and the want for a lighter trigger semi auto? Since when? No one else has done it, ever, and I see the same complaints in the powder burner world. I think that has to do with a safety issue. I believe it was Huben who came the closest but having never owned one, I cannot validate
Augie, I totally agree. I was one of the three that made the Pro Finals at RMAC 2024 with a Skout. Unfortunately I wasn’t on the podium but the failure was me, not the gun. To have 3 make the Pro Finals, which is about half of the total competing Pro division with the Skout is pretty darn good in my book… 😎
 
Last edited:
Augie, I totally agree. I was one of the three that made the Pro Finals at RMAC 2024 with a Skout. Unfortunately I wasn’t on the podium but the failure was me, not the gun. To have 3 make the Pro Finals, which is about half of the total competing Pro division with the Skout is pretty darn good in my book… 😎
But it's my understanding that some of the skout shooters were not using skout barrels? Some were submoa barrels and other fx liners. Which is cool but for someone wanting to just get a gun and go compete with it factory wise is misleading thinking theirs is the same as the next Joe Blow.

Just like people have done with karma guns , ghost etc.
 
Last edited:
But it's my understanding that some of the skout shooters were not using skout barrels? Some were submoa barrels and other fx liners. Which is cool but for someone wanting to just get a gun and go compete with it factory wise is misleading thinking theirs is the same as the next Joe Blow.

Just like people have done with karma guns , ghost etc.
You are correct. However show me the shooter that made the Pro Finals with a stock gun. I asked two shooters in the top five if their guns were stock, and both had a good laugh…
 
You are correct. However show me the shooter that made the Pro Finals with a stock gun. I asked two shooters in the top five if their guns were stock, and both had a good laugh…
Oh I believe you I shot PRS forever and still do and there's nothing stock with our gun. Like I said I don't blame people for doing it to get the best advantage they can over the next guy beside you on the bench.

It's just frustrating that people spend that much money on any gun of any type for competition and they have to throw more money at it to be competitive or just realize you're going to be middle of the pack and be happy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oregun
Continuing on the topic of a possible burst mode on a hypothetical future model (I’ve been thinking about possible implementations), a single press of the fire timer could be semi, a long press, full, and a double tap could be burst. Rounds per burst could be set in options. Depending upon implementation, setting the rounds per burst to match the size of a magazine might be a nice way to do a full-auto dump while preventing air waste and dry firing when reaching the end of the mag like occurs with purely mechanical hammerless designs.

Just dropping ideas, no response needed.
 
Oh I believe you I shot PRS forever and still do and there's nothing stock with our gun. Like I said I don't blame people for doing it to get the best advantage they can over the next guy beside you on the bench.

It's just frustrating that people spend that much money on any gun of any type for competition and they have to throw more money at it to be competitive or just realize you're going to be middle of the pack and be happy

I just had this discussion yesterday with a friend, how way back in the day when “adult airguns”(Dr Robert Beeman quote”) made the scene, this small market was targeting the people that wanted more than what a box store gamo pump up could offer. These people were probably already hunters, target shooters, but wanted something that could be accurate enough to hit a peanut at 30 yards, and were willing to pay for the quality that these guns showboated.
Then the market grew and then came thd daystates, the FX’s, and a lot of them were European built, all targeting that same group of people.

The guns were accurate enough for competition so now here comes along events like field target and such. Actual benchrest didn’t happen till years later, and that’s where FX gained in popularity as now they were creating these super super accurate platforms for now an even more specialized group of folks.

Understand that in todays “adult airgun” market, there are plinkers and there are hunters. These folks can do with a lot of the common platforms out there like the FX wildcats, Crowns, and for Daystate the hunstsman groups of guns are ideal for those folks. If a company wants to cater to the benchrest accuracy seeking folks, well then, that’s a whole new specialty. They can’t have the barrel that comes with the common Revere, or the common Impsct. They can’t have the same trigger that these “stock” guns have. The innards have to be better, and a customer wanting to truly dive into this arena will have to pay for it.

Then you have company’s like Skout, that full on developed a gun dedicated for the bench. Same with the panda, and the Thomas guns. Are they good enough to go to your first RMAC with? Sure they are. Are you wanting to outshoot a guy like Thayne that scored a 240? Well, now you’re gonna have to take that platform to an even higher level. Wether it comes from parts modifications, specialized ammo, or hours and hours on end testing(that part is more of me, lol), then that’s what one has to do.

I told this same person I was discussing this with, if today I decided to open up an airgun store, a boutique to cater to the folks with the $$ who want the best of the best, I would divide that store into two departments- one side for the “normal” folks that want the best for plinking and hunting, then a second department for the competitive folks. Same guns in each department, but different innards.

Edit- I wanted to add, that if you’re an airgun store that isn’t catering to the competitive community competing heavy into field target, PRS, bench and the big bore disciplines, and by catering I’m talking specialty barrels, triggers, aftermarket bolt on parts, etc, you will fall short as this competition thing isn’t going bye bye. It growing in leaps and bounds. If you don’t have it, your customer base will seek it elsewhere for sure.
 
Last edited:
I just had this discussion yesterday with a friend, how way back in the day when “adult airguns”(Dr Robert Beeman quote”) made the scene, this small market was targeting the people that wanted more than what a box store gamo pump up could offer. These people were probably already hunters, target shooters, but wanted something that could be accurate enough to hit a peanut at 30 yards, and were willing to pay for the quality that these guns showboated.
Then the market grew and then came thd daystates, the FX’s, and a lot of them were European built, all targeting that same group of people.

The guns were accurate enough for competition so now here comes along events like field target and such. Actual benchrest didn’t happen till years later, and that’s where FX gained in popularity as now they were creating these super super accurate platforms for now an even more specialized group of folks.

Understand that in todays “adult airgun” market, there are plinkers and there are hunters. These folks can do with a lot of the common platforms out there like the FX wildcats, Crowns, and for Daystate the hunstsman groups of guns are ideal for those folks. If a company wants to cater to the benchrest accuracy seeking folks, well then, that’s a whole new specialty. They can’t have the barrel that comes with the common Revere, or the common Impsct. They can’t have the same trigger that these “stock” guns have. The innards have to be better, and a customer wanting to truly dive into this arena will have to pay for it.

Then you have company’s like Skout, that full on developed a gun dedicated for the bench. Same with the panda, and the Thomas guns. Are they good enough to go to your first RMAC with? Sure they are. Are you wanting to outshoot a guy like Thayne that scored a 240? Well, now you’re gonna have to take that platform to an even higher level. Wether it comes from parts modifications, specialized ammo, or hours and hours on end testing(that part is more of me, lol), then that’s what one has to do.

I told this same person I was discussing this with, if today I decided to open up an airgun store, a boutique to cater to the folks with the $$ who want the best of the best, I would divide that store into two departments- one side for the “normal” folks that want the best for plinking and hunting, then a second department for the competitive folks. Same guns in each department, but different innards.
I agree with that 100% but with a caveat. I'm a hunter before a target shooter just the way I was raised and do that mostly. To me taking an animal deserves the best accuracy to dispatch it quickly and takes priority over targets. So I choose the most accurate gun I can afford to do that. I shoot competitions but if I miss a target it's no biggie but if I wound an animal and it runs off to die an agonizing death not good on my part. So the need for consistent accuracy and no poi shifts is just as important to me probably more important. I'm willing to pay for that or do what I need to do to a gun to get that.
It's like 100yd benchrest im wanting to try but for me to go to like RMAC, EBR that's at least a solid week of vacation time per event. It's hard for me to justify 2 events a year and drop a ton of money on a setup for 2 events a year. Sure I will shoot it a lot at home. In my area I have to look at what's available to do. FT yes I tried that not for me. PRS yes been doing that with PBs and might dive into it with Airguns. Do I want an accurate bench gun heck yes and knowing me I'll get one. lol

But I do like tricked out hunting guns

Jon