Slugs & Molds - Designing, Making and Testing

I've been messing around with some different slug designs for a bit now and figured I'd share and ask for some help.

Here's my latest attempt at making a .51 mold that shoots straight.

20240723_211322.jpg

20240723_211349.jpg

20240723_211359.jpg


This is a 300gr .510 design that represents the culmination of my (novice level) understanding of what makes a decent air gun slug. I made it specifically for my challenger elite 51, so one of the main requirements is that it fit in the magazine. I just made these and haven't tested them yet, but this is a V2 of a previous design that did reasonably well. Hoping this is an improvement.

I've been on a mission to find a decent mold for my 51, and boy has that let me down a rabbit hole. I did the "buy and try" method with a bunch of 357 molds... that got expensive... so instead of spending a fortune on noe and accurate molds it kinda made more sense to make my own molds from scratch. In the pics above is my first completely-from-scratch mold, aside from the lee 2cav handle.

I started making molds from the lee 2 cavity blanks. Having used a bunch of them I quickly learned their shortcomings. One of my biggest gripes about them is the sprue plate. They have a tendency to lift up on the cavity farthest from the screw causing one slug to be longer. Doesn't seem to be a problem on molds that have a second screw to hold down the sprue plate, so I integrated that concept. I also discovered that having a very flat and smoothly machined sprue plate will help the mold operate smoothly, with less lubrication and less galling of the aluminum. Another gripe about the lee 2cav blanks is that they are not, flat, square, true, plumb, centered, even or consistent. All the things that would help make a precise mold... they don't have it. This made machining a pain... so just another reason to make em from scratch.

As far as the shape of the projectile... I have very few answers and many, many questions. Some of the first slugs I made were very simple shapes. Straight sides with a modestly rounded nose. These shot horribly. Maybe even keyholing, which was quite confusing. I only fired them a few times... just enough to know that they were wild then moved on. Here's an example of that.

20240626_202426.jpg


I started making some attempts at a slug with higher BC than a typical hollow point or wadcutter. Simple G1 style, tangent ogive, and some simple grooves on the OD. I've had some interesting results that raise a lot of questions. Here's an example that shot wildly.

20240626_202410.jpg


I had high hopes for that one... it looked cool at least! Here's a couple that shot pretty well.

20240702_202114.jpg


The two above... both molds had some chatter so I endes up remaking them with a few tweaks. Results are pretty decent... need more testing time at the bench.

‐‐---------

That's some of what I've done so far... too tired to write more... will continue soon.

Also, I am actively seeking any books, docs or comments that would help design better slugs. Please let me know!
 
I'm just so impressed!!!! Those hollow points look awesome!!!!!! It seems to me airgun s.pretty shoot same designs as
Pistol black powder and modern spire.point designs....My 510 Texan shoots well.with 650 grain spire point.boat tail.....5 B.C. all it is ..Is a.copy of 50 bmg 647 grain ball ammo....I would copy some light cast loads.from the .500 smith and wesson,,,should be right grain weights and size for your magazine....
 
  • Like
Reactions: caliusoptimus
I've been messing around with some different slug designs for a bit now and figured I'd share and ask for some help.

Here's my latest attempt at making a .51 mold that shoots straight.

View attachment 482364
View attachment 482365
View attachment 482366

This is a 300gr .510 design that represents the culmination of my (novice level) understanding of what makes a decent air gun slug. I made it specifically for my challenger elite 51, so one of the main requirements is that it fit in the magazine. I just made these and haven't tested them yet, but this is a V2 of a previous design that did reasonably well. Hoping this is an improvement.

I've been on a mission to find a decent mold for my 51, and boy has that let me down a rabbit hole. I did the "buy and try" method with a bunch of 357 molds... that got expensive... so instead of spending a fortune on noe and accurate molds it kinda made more sense to make my own molds from scratch. In the pics above is my first completely-from-scratch mold, aside from the lee 2cav handle.

I started making molds from the lee 2 cavity blanks. Having used a bunch of them I quickly learned their shortcomings. One of my biggest gripes about them is the sprue plate. They have a tendency to lift up on the cavity farthest from the screw causing one slug to be longer. Doesn't seem to be a problem on molds that have a second screw to hold down the sprue plate, so I integrated that concept. I also discovered that having a very flat and smoothly machined sprue plate will help the mold operate smoothly, with less lubrication and less galling of the aluminum. Another gripe about the lee 2cav blanks is that they are not, flat, square, true, plumb, centered, even or consistent. All the things that would help make a precise mold... they don't have it. This made machining a pain... so just another reason to make em from scratch.

As far as the shape of the projectile... I have very few answers and many, many questions. Some of the first slugs I made were very simple shapes. Straight sides with a modestly rounded nose. These shot horribly. Maybe even keyholing, which was quite confusing. I only fired them a few times... just enough to know that they were wild then moved on. Here's an example of that.

View attachment 482371

I started making some attempts at a slug with higher BC than a typical hollow point or wadcutter. Simple G1 style, tangent ogive, and some simple grooves on the OD. I've had some interesting results that raise a lot of questions. Here's an example that shot wildly.

View attachment 482372

I had high hopes for that one... it looked cool at least! Here's a couple that shot pretty well.

View attachment 482374

The two above... both molds had some chatter so I endes up remaking them with a few tweaks. Results are pretty decent... need more testing time at the bench.

‐‐---------

That's some of what I've done so far... too tired to write more... will continue soon.

Also, I am actively seeking any books, docs or comments that would help design better slugs. Please let me know!


I am very impressed by what you are doing — excellent!

Congrats on not fearing to fail many times before succeeding. Our lightbulbs came to us thanks to Thomas Edinson's tireless trials-and-errors.

I have saved the first photo for my files — I would love to have a a slug with THAT HUGE HOLLOW POINT in .22cal, .25cal, and .30cal. It would be devastating on short range pests.


I'm still waiting for some slug maker to bring such a model to the market.
(I myself have considered making my own projectiles, but my current country of residence has some laws that might see interpret this as criminal act, depending on the prosecutor's interpretation of exant legal code.... 🤦🏻‍♂️).


Keep up the good work. 👏🏼

Matthias
 
  • Like
Reactions: caliusoptimus
That’s quite a bit higher tech than mine. I have a homemade 2 axis saddle for my mini lathe, lol. It’s only for molds and dies but gets the job done.

It can be frustrating getting a slug that works. I’ve got a few designs that look like they should work and just don’t.

I have learned that slugs require very little engagement to work correctly and the shorter (for caliber) they are, the more critical the barrel chamber becomes. So proper chamber dimensions are critical with slugs, IMO.

I agree 100% that Lee sprue plates are terrible. lol

Thanks for sharing!

Dave
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: caliusoptimus
I'm just so impressed!!!! Those hollow points look awesome!!!!!! It seems to me airgun s.pretty shoot same designs as
Pistol black powder and modern spire.point designs....My 510 Texan shoots well.with 650 grain spire point.boat tail.....5 B.C. all it is ..Is a.copy of 50 bmg 647 grain ball ammo....I would copy some light cast loads.from the .500 smith and wesson,,,should be right grain weights and size for your magazine....
Thanks! I'm pround of those HPs... took a lot of work and I'm glad they turned out decent.

I'd love to try some longer G7 style slugs. Unfortunately my rifles are all pretty limited on slug length. Kinda want to pick up a texan just to shoot the long bois.

As for the pistol slugs... I'm avoiding tradition PB designs. Partly because making those sharp angles would take way more tooling, programming and time. Partly because they all have grooves and features that just aren't needed for an AG. Anyone feel free to correct me on this... it seems like the big lube groove on PB ammo acts a bit like a pellet skirt. Both stabilizing the shot and increasing drag. Maybe no problem if I was filling the groove but I don't have a lube sizer. All that said I have a bunch of traditional style pistol and rifle molds in 357 and most shoot fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RM.510bigbore
Thanks! I'm pround of those HPs... took a lot of work and I'm glad they turned out decent.

I'd love to try some longer G7 style slugs. Unfortunately my rifles are all pretty limited on slug length. Kinda want to pick up a texan just to shoot the long bois.

As for the pistol slugs... I'm avoiding tradition PB designs. Partly because making those sharp angles would take way more tooling, programming and time. Partly because they all have grooves and features that just aren't needed for an AG. Anyone feel free to correct me on this... it seems like the big lube groove on PB ammo acts a bit like a pellet skirt. Both stabilizing the shot and increasing drag. Maybe no problem if I was filling the groove but I don't have a lube sizer. All that said I have a bunch of traditional style pistol and rifle molds in 357 and most shoot fine.
Both style of molds shoot for me both traditional with lube groves and smooth designs for powder coating...That said I powder coat both designs and use a lip lube too...With airgun s you should be fine with your designs... I'm sure with your skill and patience you will.design a mold your .510 Green Mountain barrel will love...Give powder coating a try its.pretty. easy...Well worth it...
 
  • Like
Reactions: caliusoptimus
That’s quite a bit higher tech than mine. I have a homemade 2 axis saddle for my mini lathe, lol. It’s only for molds and dies but gets the job done.

It can be frustrating getting a slug that works. I’ve got a few designs that look like they should work and just don’t.

I have learned that slugs require very little engagement to work correctly and the shorter (for caliber) they are, the more critical the barrel chamber becomes. So proper chamber dimensions are critical with slugs, IMO.

I agree 100% that Lee sprue plates are terrible. lol

Thanks for sharing!

Dave
I had the same thought about the barrel leade. I made the leade in my .51 to almost exactly 0.5110". My 357 rattler on the other hand... the leade on that one is just a taper to rifling. That mechanism is very different from a bolt action though.
 
I've been messing around with some different slug designs for a bit now and figured I'd share and ask for some help.

Here's my latest attempt at making a .51 mold that shoots straight.

View attachment 482364
View attachment 482365
View attachment 482366

This is a 300gr .510 design that represents the culmination of my (novice level) understanding of what makes a decent air gun slug. I made it specifically for my challenger elite 51, so one of the main requirements is that it fit in the magazine. I just made these and haven't tested them yet, but this is a V2 of a previous design that did reasonably well. Hoping this is an improvement.

I've been on a mission to find a decent mold for my 51, and boy has that let me down a rabbit hole. I did the "buy and try" method with a bunch of 357 molds... that got expensive... so instead of spending a fortune on noe and accurate molds it kinda made more sense to make my own molds from scratch. In the pics above is my first completely-from-scratch mold, aside from the lee 2cav handle.

I started making molds from the lee 2 cavity blanks. Having used a bunch of them I quickly learned their shortcomings. One of my biggest gripes about them is the sprue plate. They have a tendency to lift up on the cavity farthest from the screw causing one slug to be longer. Doesn't seem to be a problem on molds that have a second screw to hold down the sprue plate, so I integrated that concept. I also discovered that having a very flat and smoothly machined sprue plate will help the mold operate smoothly, with less lubrication and less galling of the aluminum. Another gripe about the lee 2cav blanks is that they are not, flat, square, true, plumb, centered, even or consistent. All the things that would help make a precise mold... they don't have it. This made machining a pain... so just another reason to make em from scratch.

As far as the shape of the projectile... I have very few answers and many, many questions. Some of the first slugs I made were very simple shapes. Straight sides with a modestly rounded nose. These shot horribly. Maybe even keyholing, which was quite confusing. I only fired them a few times... just enough to know that they were wild then moved on. Here's an example of that.

View attachment 482371

I started making some attempts at a slug with higher BC than a typical hollow point or wadcutter. Simple G1 style, tangent ogive, and some simple grooves on the OD. I've had some interesting results that raise a lot of questions. Here's an example that shot wildly.

View attachment 482372

I had high hopes for that one... it looked cool at least! Here's a couple that shot pretty well.

View attachment 482374

The two above... both molds had some chatter so I endes up remaking them with a few tweaks. Results are pretty decent... need more testing time at the bench.

‐‐---------

That's some of what I've done so far... too tired to write more... will continue soon.

Also, I am actively seeking any books, docs or comments that would help design better slugs. Please let me know!
As far as design, I don’t know of any great literature to read. I have used the ‘idea’ of a bore riding nose, slim waist, and a single driving band with a boattail. This can be found in the BBT style slugs used by many in the airgun caster’s arena.

Here are a couple .22’s of that style that were culled but it shows what I mean. Also, a 30 mold I made that shows a short for caliber version.

You mentioned success with your last picture and it is similar but looks like it has 2 distinct bands. On the BBT, it has the ogive being the front contact.

Dave
IMG_6149.jpeg
IMG_6148.jpeg
 
As far as design, I don’t know of any great literature to read. I have used the ‘idea’ of a bore riding nose, slim waist, and a single driving band with a boattail. This can be found in the BBT style slugs used by many in the airgun caster’s arena.

Here are a couple .22’s of that style that were culled but it shows what I mean. Also, a 30 mold I made that shows a short for caliber version.

You mentioned success with your last picture and it is similar but looks like it has 2 distinct bands. On the BBT, it has the ogive being the front contact.

DaveView attachment 482698View attachment 482699
Nice looking designs! I made one or two boat tails, but shortly after I started hearing that flat base is pretty much always preferred for short-ish range target shooting. That's most of what I do, so it would make sense leave out that variable until I'm dialed enough for 300 yards or more.

Any thoughts on the bore riding sections? I'm guessing it provides alignment and stability in the barrel without all the friction of a full diameter, and the driving band provides the seal and engages rifling for spin. Would be interesting to compare one slug design with different bands, grooves and diameters.
 
I believe you are correct about the bore riding portion providing alignment and the driving band providing the seal and rifling engagement. The relatively low pressures we use can be managed with a pretty small band.

I carried over the idea of flat base being best at shorter ranges from my pb learnings as you did. I have since convinced myself that at least in some cases, this is not so with air. I feel that it has to do more with muzzle pressure management than other factors.

Fwiw, the examples I showed above rely heavily on the bbt design mentioned before.

Dave
 
  • Like
Reactions: caliusoptimus
Did some testkng this weekend with some interesting and unexpected results.

20240723_213407.jpg


These are the slugs I've been testing. Left to right are:

1. Mr Hollow Point 310gr.
2. My mold, 295gr
3. My mold, 300gr
4. My mold, also 300gr

I've had some pretty great results with #1. Had some 100yd groups around 2" and it has been one of the most accurate I've tried.

#2 Has been doing pretty well. About 1.5" groups at 50yd, and 3"ish at 100yd.

#3 This weekend this one was wild. Couldn't make a group at 50yd. The previous weekend I managed to make a group at least... maybe 2" at 50yd. No idea what changed. Maybe the rifle, maybe something else, I really don't know. The previous weekend there was a significant shift on the point of aim between slug 2 and 3.

#4 Tried this weekend for the first time. Wild, couldn't get a group at 50yd.


I just checked the kolbe stability calculator for slug 3 and 4, which are very nearly the same. Both showing SF of 2.3-2.5 at my velocities (900ish) and twist rate (1 in 48"). The calc doesn't take the hollow point into account though, which does drop the weight a tad and shifts the center of mass to the back by roughly 0.05".

What's really eating me is how slug #1 is so similar to 3 and 4... and shoots great. The overall shape between them is very similar, and so is the internal shape of the hollow point. One big difference is that mine are cast from 2.5% tin, where #1 is pure lead.


I've been using 2.5% tin mostly because someone recommended it, and because it casts really nice. I'll probably switch bach to pure lead for future tests. The hardness is about 10 as opposed to pure being around 5. Maybe that's a factor...?
 
I want to mention what several long range shooters here in AGN have posted recently:

The type of base (flat, dish, cup, deep) will make a difference in the seating depth of the slug. Which will make a difference in its precision.

Matthias
By seating depth do you mean... the depth that is set when the probe pushes the slug into the barrel?