N/A Springer bench rest contraptions

I have found that resting the gun at its balance point on a soft bag, and shouldering the rear is about as good as you will get. For me it doesn't change the POI from normal shooting enough that I notice it.

Then again, if I have a springer that is that temperamental, I work on it till it's not.

Any more complicated than that and I don't see the point for my uses.
I really had very good luck today shooting off the pillows. They made for a surprisingly stable rest. I was shooting some of my most powerful and hold sensitive rifles and I didn't have to do any cherry picking to get those groups. The only one that didn't shoot well was my Springfield Armory M1A replica and that thing has been a twangy, shotgun grouping POS from day 1.
 
@Nitrocrushr I saw you made a recoil measuring slide - could it be used to shoot accurate groups?
It was designed for the sole purpose of measuring the linear recoil on springers. I would doubt it would have been a tool you would want to set up for bench shooting. For that type of use I would have built it a bit differently.

Steve
 
Heres my post on "Free Floating Springer forearm"...might give you some ideas.Pete

That is really interesting and is somewhat along the lines of what I was originally thinking. My idea was more along the lines of clamping the rifle into a sled that could recoil freely on roller bearings. It looks like yours is more intended to slide on delrin rails that are bolted to the rifle.

It's interesting that it was so effective.
 
It was designed for the sole purpose of measuring the linear recoil on springers. I would doubt it would have been a tool you would want to set up for bench shooting. For that type of use I would have built it a bit differently.

Steve
On that note I should make a 3” square foreend that fits on my one piece rest. There is almost zero friction with the roller bearing top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bandito
You behave like a child that needs a spanking.

If you spoke to me like that face to face you would get one.

Don't treat me with disrespect or we will tangle. Don't post at my expense or we will tangle. Leave people alone and things will go a lot smoother.
No problem. But you did set yourself up. You have to admit your post was just a little squirrely. Have a sense of humor, Bob
Hopefully if we come face to face we'll laugh it off. No disrespect intended. None.

Regarding the post, I understand the desire to remove yourself from the equation when trying to diagnose what might be or might be your hold. Or the gun or even ammunition inconsistencies.
Sizing or sorting and weighing the pellets would be relevant at this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bandito
Regarding the post, I understand the desire to remove yourself from the equation when trying to diagnose what might be or might be your hold. Or the gun or even ammunition inconsistencies.
Sizing or sorting and weighing the pellets would be relevant at this point
This is it exactly. You can waste a ton of time and ammo trying to determine what pellets a gun shoots best when your own error opens every other group up 1/2" and you're not sure which is which, so you just repeat the process until you feel somewhat confident. Then there are the times when the groups are disappointing and you think you must be doing something wrong, but you just can't figure out what.

Having a repeatable system to test a guns accuracy with as little human error as possible would be great and I'd really like to see something like it in use for gun reviews. Imagine being able to strap a gun into a sled, connect a remote sight viewer and a remote trigger release, fire 10 or so shots and get a quantifiable metric for its accuracy. We can do it for velocities. It would sure be nice to be able to do the same for accuracy.
 
No problem. But you did set yourself up. You have to admit your post was just a little squirrely. Have a sense of humor, Bob
Hopefully if we come face to face we'll laugh it off. No disrespect intended. None.

Regarding the post, I understand the desire to remove yourself from the equation when trying to diagnose what might be or might be your hold. Or the gun or even ammunition inconsistencies.
Sizing or sorting and weighing the pellets would be relevant at this point

I guess I didn't realize adult men thought that was funny.

In that case you would look cute in a set of rubber tits too!! As a matter of fact I'm getting a little sweaty thinking about it.
 
Last edited:
This is it exactly. You can waste a ton of time and ammo trying to determine what pellets a gun shoots best when your own error opens every other group up 1/2" and you're not sure which is which, so you just repeat the process until you feel somewhat confident. Then there are the times when the groups are disappointing and you think you must be doing something wrong, but you just can't figure out what.

Having a repeatable system to test a guns accuracy with as little human error as possible would be great and I'd really like to see something like it in use for gun reviews. Imagine being able to strap a gun into a sled, connect a remote sight viewer and a remote trigger release, fire 10 or so shots and get a quantifiable metric for its accuracy. We can do it for velocities. It would sure be nice to be able to do the same for accuracy.
But heck, that would relieve all the stress and anxiety spring guns can bring on. Kinda like women. You know the old saying.......
If it has tXts or wheels, (or springs)
It'll give ya problems!
I guess I didn't realize adult men thought that was funny.

In that case you would look cute in a set of rubber tits too!! As a matter of fact I'm getting a little sweaty thinking about it.
Mamma don’t allow that
 
Having a repeatable system to test a guns accuracy with as little human error as possible would be great and I'd really like to see something like it in use for gun reviews. Imagine being able to strap a gun into a sled, connect a remote sight viewer and a remote trigger release, fire 10 or so shots and get a quantifiable metric for its accuracy. We can do it for velocities. It would sure be nice to be able to do the same for accuracy.
It would be nice. But its a pipe dream for springers. You're not getting consistency strapping any springer down to anything. I do a lot of PB shooting and know lots of hunter's that bought into the concept lead sleds to zero their rifles. They usually surprised by either how hard it is to get decent accuracy on the sled or how far off their zero is when they shoot the rifle normally. If they don't even work well for 3000fps rifles that the bullet clears the barrel much faster than a 900fps pellet. They're not going work on a piston gun. Recoil must be dealt with in the fashion the rifle will be used. I might add lead sled and other devices that fix rifles in place are harder on optics because recoil energy has to go somewhere. Basically rifles strapped and held in place rattle then selves apart faster.

Changes in hold and recoil management affect harmonics. That can change both zero and overall accuracy. Obviously there are rifles that can be rested and tested. PCPs rimfire and low recoiling rifle cartridges come to mind. With relatively slowwer shooting piston gun results my not be repeatable and or appropriate for it's practical use.
 
There are dozens of silicone items at your local adult bookstore you could take a rest on.

There are silicone gel seat cushions, knee and elbow pads, kids toys...

You could use a fake tit. Or a pair. Or get a big rubber butt and lay the forend in the crack. I bet you could find a silicone ballistic torso. Lay it face down and it would make a fine airgun rest.
the picture i got in my head reading this was at a Bench Rest competition HAHAHAHAHA thanks !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bedrock Bob
It would be nice. But its a pipe dream for springers. You're not getting consistency strapping any springer down to anything. I do a lot of PB shooting and know lots of hunter's that bought into the concept lead sleds to zero their rifles. They usually surprised by either how hard it is to get decent accuracy on the sled or how far off their zero is when they shoot the rifle normally. If they don't even work well for 3000fps rifles that the bullet clears the barrel much faster than a 900fps pellet. They're not going work on a piston gun. Recoil must be dealt with in the fashion the rifle will be used. I might add lead sled and other devices that fix rifles in place are harder on optics because recoil energy has to go somewhere. Basically rifles strapped and held in place rattle then selves apart faster.

Changes in hold and recoil management affect harmonics. That can change both zero and overall accuracy. Obviously there are rifles that can be rested and tested. PCPs rimfire and low recoiling rifle cartridges come to mind. With relatively slowwer shooting piston gun results my not be repeatable and or appropriate for it's practical use.
The way I see it is that recoil management needs to be incorporated into the design to basically replicate a human firing the gun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nitrocrushr
The way I see it is that recoil management needs to be incorporated into the design to basically replicate a human firing the gun.
That would be good to have. Sometimes if I'm sorting accuracy issues and I think I may be the weak link I'll switch to a known consistent rifle or ask someone else to shoot the questionable rifle.

I do quite a bit of bench style shooting and personally find fully rested shooting too far removed from me to enjoy. Then again some people think anything but offhand isn't shooting. Everyone has their own prefered style of shooting. I just know from experience that POI and accuracy usually changes between methods of testing.
 
My results have been inconsistent, to say the least.
I almost posted the question.
Am I really a good shot or just an incredible luck shot?
Frustration followed by clearing the marksman target at 75 yards. Followed by I can't hit a 1 3/4" Crazy Eight, but then again the wind has been quite formidable foe, and I haven't been using my anti cant device. Cant or windage shouldn't cause my shots to drop low, or high, only L or R, though.
My worst shots are the ones that are hard to get lined up in the first place, forcing and holding the alignment for the shot.
Forcing the aim up or down to line up, along with cheek and shoulder weld, are what I consider elevation issues.
I've tried the forward rest close to the balance point, and didn't getaway real change.
So, I was hoping for an article by someone who has been studying and getting results at benchrest springer class shooting. 👍
20250111_170708.jpg
 
My results have been inconsistent, to say the least.
I almost posted the question.
Am I really a good shot or just an incredible luck shot?
Frustration followed by clearing the marksman target at 75 yards. Followed by I can't hit a 1 3/4" Crazy Eight, but then again the wind has been quite formidable foe, and I haven't been using my anti cant device. Cant or windage shouldn't cause my shots to drop low, or high, only L or R, though.
My worst shots are the ones that are hard to get lined up in the first place, forcing and holding the alignment for the shot.
Forcing the aim up or down to line up, along with cheek and shoulder weld, are what I consider elevation issues.
I've tried the forward rest close to the balance point, and didn't getaway real change.
So, I was hoping for an article by someone who has been studying and getting results at benchrest springer class shooting. 👍
I'd try the pillow technique. I haven't experimented with it much yet, but I was sure shooting nice groups with a couple of spring piston hammers and just resting the full length of the stock from the front of the forearm to the pistol grip was surprisingly stable. It might have looked a bit less so had I had more than 12x magnification though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: .20calguy
I too am one of those guys that like to take me out of the equation as much as possible. Especially when making a change to ammo or optics.
Here is a device I copied off of pictures posted on the internet. the original poster did not give any measurements, so based on knowing the paint roller was 4 inches across, I guesstimated the rest of the measurements. If I made another one I would make it shorter. For the benches I use I really didn't need something this tall. And I have seen simpler arrangements that accomplish the same thing. The roller moves very smoothly on a .25 in steel rod. Infact I have to be very careful because if I get the center of gravity too far back and let go the gun will easily roll off the rest and on to the floor. almost happed a couple of times:) I use a very plush roller (probably time for me to replace this one). This arrangement works very well for me.
I also have a Caldwell Led Sled, which is great for powder burners, but have not tried it with any of my springers for fear of the sharp jolt ruining a scope.

Air rifle rest view 3.jpg


Air rifle rest view 2.jpg


Air rifle rest view 1.jpg
 
I too am one of those guys that like to take me out of the equation as much as possible. Especially when making a change to ammo or optics.
Here is a device I copied off of pictures posted on the internet. the original poster did not give any measurements, so based on knowing the paint roller was 4 inches across, I guesstimated the rest of the measurements. If I made another one I would make it shorter. For the benches I use I really didn't need something this tall. And I have seen simpler arrangements that accomplish the same thing. The roller moves very smoothly on a .25 in steel rod. Infact I have to be very careful because if I get the center of gravity too far back and let go the gun will easily roll off the rest and on to the floor. almost happed a couple of times:) I use a very plush roller (probably time for me to replace this one). This arrangement works very well for me.
I also have a Caldwell Led Sled, which is great for powder burners, but have not tried it with any of my springers for fear of the sharp jolt ruining a scope.

View attachment 540277

View attachment 540278

View attachment 540279
Man! Is that deluxe or what? Nice craftsmanship