I have to agree with others who have said that they prefer the MOA-Quad retical. At mid ranges, I hold under, so the top half of the retical gets a lot of use. A Christmas tree would be appreciated, but keep it simple. I don’t really think that the Christmas tree needs all of the subtensions of the main crosshairs. The visual weight of the current stadia lines is just about perfect in my opinion.
Coincidently, I just ordered a 16x42 SWFA SS scope a week ago to use on a rifle that I shoot at ranges as close as 10 meters and as distant as 100 yards. When it arrived, the only thing that I didn’t like was that it wouldn’t focus down to ten yards, as indicated on the SWFA website and on the focus ring of the scope itself. It was way off, focusing no closer than 13 yards. For me, this is a deal breaker, and I suspect that I’m not alone. When I called about the issue, the customer service rep said that it was just a problem with the unit that was sent to me, and that they would be able to provide a scope to me that would meet their published specification. Yesterday, my scope went out via UPS, on its way back to Texas, where I have been told that SWFA will hand screen their inventory to find a scope that meets the minimum focus spec. That’s good service. If SWFA is serious about serving the airgun market, the ten yard minimum focus specification will need to get high priority.