New kid on the block with insane powers and yet not a monster. 59 ft/ibs in .177cal. It here pelletshooting no longer make sence. Its heavy slugs only.
www.taipan-airguns.com
Taipan Airguns

That .177 barrel better have a 1:14 twist barrel. No point in having a .177 slugs capable of making that power if it won't stabilize.New kid on the block with insane powers and yet not a monster. 59 ft/ibs in .177cal. It here pelletshooting no longer make sence. Its heavy slugs only.
Taipan Airguns
www.taipan-airguns.com
Judging by the way Taipan doesn’t rush things to market; I’d wager they did their homework before releasing this rifle.That .177 barrel better have a 1:14 twist barrel. No point in having a .177 slugs capable of making that power if it won't stabilize.
I hope so, hopefully they took a page from the Russian alpha precision barrels as they have 1:14.6 and 1:15.4 twist for .177Judging by the way Taipan doesn’t rush things to market; I’d wager they did their homework before releasing this rifle.
I have contacted Taipan asked what the twistratio is in their .177cal barrels. Ordinary pelletstuff will be blown to dust and maybe even start skipping lands in the barrel due to too soft lead.I hope so, hopefully they took a page from the Russian alpha precision barrels as they have 1:14.6 and 1:15.4 twist for .177
Awesome! Let us know please!I have contacted Taipan asked what the twistratio is in their .177cal barrels.
It’s all for numbers and displaying it on their advertisement/commercial.That .177 barrel better have a 1:14 twist barrel. No point in having a .177 slugs capable of making that power if it won't stabilize.
Maybe? But that would only hurt their brand as they've been always upfront about what their guns can and WILL produce ya know?It’s all for numbers and displaying it on their advertisement/commercial.![]()
Right... hmm. Odd.Maybe? But that would only hurt their brand as they've been always upfront about what their guns can and WILL produce ya know?
Something better than nothing, although you would think they would've done that testing already before showing it off.I have recieved some info:
I am here quoting from the mail I recieved from Taipan:
Hi Jens(my name)
"Now we have 12groove CZ barrels no chock. Now we testing 4,5caliber in 40j but for sure we will test also more. Maximum length of slugs is 12mm. Best regards Marek Dengl"..
Here was my question from my first mail
"Hi Taipan.
Congratulations with your new release of the Slash.
I am ekstremly impressed with its performance.
Here in Denmark all airguns are free to own if the caliber is 4,5mm.
When the Slash does upward 59 ft/ibs or 80joule in .177cal(4,5mm) it can only be usefull with heavy slugs like ZANS 22-24grain slugs. However what is the twistratio in the barrel of the 4,5mm?..
KIndest regards. Jens"
Exactly my thoughts. It's a bold move to show and say things before testing. If everything they say is true, L2 will have to come up with the L3 with the same power or more.Something better than nothing, although you would think they would've done that testing already before showing it off.
It's too early to know for sure, but it seems the Slash will be cheaper and slightly more powerful than the L2.What are you guys thinking of this vs the leshiy 2?
I understand no one has been able to try it yet and would be pure speculation at this point.
I’m still pretty new to understanding/comparing all the specs.
Ths what I have been telling for years and years. When you mention this to the manufature they go completely silent!.My 4.5 mm Two in 700 mm is listed from Epic with a 79 J power ( using 16 grain beast pellet ) i think that pellet need to fly really fast to get to 79 J
For sure speeds that will yield 0 accuracy i think.
I have been above 70 J shooting 22 and 24 grain Zan slugs, and i can also push them even faster but i have not tried that of course.
I see no reason listing a power enevelop you can not successfully achieve with any off the shelf ammo, and not least still have accuracy,,,,,, good accuracy.