Thanks. I'll try to search for that video.There is a 20 min video on youtube by balistas I believe. you can judge there how it seems.
Upvote 0
Thanks. I'll try to search for that video.There is a 20 min video on youtube by balistas I believe. you can judge there how it seems.
Similar weight, their mod is inclusive, think you would need to remove it to thread an aftermarket one.Very good review. He may have answered these & I didn't catch it, but has anyone seen:
- what thread pitch is used for the moderator?
- weight of the tactical version?
I sent an email to Tony at talon tunes to confirm. It’s a total bummer. I have no idea why they would remove that feature. It was my favorite feature of the vet platform. Made me lean towards the edgun instead.Madeintheuk
I did not realize that they removed that feature. Did Taipan provide a reason why (was there a thread on this)? I have a Veteran Standard and without the anti-double feed feature there is nothing gained for me to "upgrade" as the original cocking lever position was never an issue for me. Hopefully they reconsider and revise the design.
-PJ
Thanks for posting the vid.Here you go...cocking mechanism looks solid and just as nice as the trigger.
Function over form for sure, but to do away with that anti double load feature! Why taipan? Why?man i think the forward cocking lever we all wanted looks super fugly with the slotted wood hole ugh. my mutant i adapted and it has taken more pests than any other ag i own, darn
TBH I don't think that it looks that bad haha, the anti double load is a shame. Seeing those pictures above man makes me want one. Maybe this could be my bench rifle.... lol sooo many optionsFunction over form for sure, but to do away with that anti double load feature! Why taipan? Why?
If they came out with a long version I think it would be prime, my Taipan long .25 shot the 33.95s excellent out to 115 at 905 fps and it was heavyNot sure I’d use it for a bench rifle, but woods walking it would be fantastic. We already know they’re rugged enough.
I'll bet it was because of space restriction. If you observe that "rocker flange" silver piece that moves the pellet probe took up considerable space and I believe that's where the anti double load system was. However, currently it seems these are the differences between the 2 models.Function over form for sure, but to do away with that anti double load feature! Why taipan? Why?
I don’t think you understand my motives. I’m not going against taipan out of protest. I buy a gun based on my needs. The anti double load feature was the most important feature on the vet when I had it. Yes, rear cocking was not ideal, but the anti double load was more important. I just bought a edgun lelya. I bought it because it’s Uber compact, accurate, robust as hell, front cocking (whether less refined or not), AND just like the r5m, has a switch to turn off magazine advancement to give me a similar feature as the anti double load.I'll bet it was because of space restriction. If you observe that "rocker flange" silver piece that moves the pellet probe took up considerable space and I believe that's where the anti double load system was. However, currently it seems these are the differences between the 2 models.
Pros - more air capacity, bigger plenum, more shots per fill , 300 bar fill, free floating barrel, robust side lever, same mags as vet 1
cons - no anti double load
Opinion - The new design appears very respectable. The loss of the anti double load feature is unfortunate. Now will Vet fans jump on this gun? Depends on personal preference, the apparent improved stock performance of the gun seems noteworthy, hardcore vet fans that loved the anti double load may shy away as the rear cocking lever was not an issue for them anyways. Potential new fans may well jump all over this gun. From my perspective, No this gun is just like any other gun I have in regards to pellet loading. Personally, I find the improvements outweigh the loss. For what it's worth, I feel the cocking system is even more durable than that in the vet 1. When I get one as the funds allow, I'll be able to say with certainty.
madeintheuk - I had an Edgun R5M, IMHO it was not in the same class as the Vet1 as far as refinement, cocking, shot cycle, etc. It's a tough gun for sure, but I found it no pleasure to shoot. But that's Me. Lastly, I don't recall the Edgun having any type of anti double load either. You are your own man of course, and I'm not lobbying for Taipan, but jumping to another brand that is similar in features out of protest may end up leaving you unfulfilled. With gun resales sucking currently, I'd say wait a bit and study closer your options. Yes, I do miss the anti double load feature, but I won't let it keep me off a rather impressive looking gun.
Very interesting, that certainly clears up some questions. I also was not aware of the Edgun magazine feature. Thanks for the info.I don’t think you understand my motives. I’m not going against taipan out of protest. I buy a gun based on my needs. The anti double load feature was the most important feature on the vet when I had it. Yes, rear cocking was not ideal, but the anti double load was more important. I just bought a edgun lelya. I bought it because it’s Uber compact, accurate, robust as hell, front cocking (whether less refined or not), AND just like the r5m, has a switch to turn off magazine advancement to give me a similar feature as the anti double load.
You see, the reason I liked the feature so much is because I’m my style of backyard shooting, there are many shots that I need to just grab the gun and be able to quickly make a shot. The anti double load feature allowed me to decock the rifle for storage with a shot ready to go. All I had to do was cock it and shoot. I can do similar with the lely, but after the first shot, I will have to remember to click the lever back to the auto rotate position. I would own the new vet if it kept the feature purely for that reason alone. I already know it’s robust, and I know it was accurate. I ultimately sold mine bc I just couldn’t get used to the rear cocking. Mostly bc I’m not as good a shooter as some, and quick follow ups give me piece of mind to not have a runaway and die slowly situation.
Anyway, I’m still a taipan fan, and if they ever brought the feature back, I would jump on it in a second.
I'll bet it was because of space restriction. If you observe that "rocker flange" silver piece that moves the pellet probe took up considerable space and I believe that's where the anti double load system was. However, currently it seems these are the differences between the 2 models.
Pros - more air capacity, bigger plenum, more shots per fill , 300 bar fill, free floating barrel, robust side lever, same mags as vet 1
cons - no anti double load
Opinion - The new design appears very respectable. The loss of the anti double load feature is unfortunate. Now will Vet fans jump on this gun? Depends on personal preference, the apparent improved stock performance of the gun seems noteworthy, hardcore vet fans that loved the anti double load may shy away as the rear cocking lever was not an issue for them anyways. Potential new fans may well jump all over this gun. From my perspective, No this gun is just like any other gun I have in regards to pellet loading. Personally, I find the improvements outweigh the loss. For what it's worth, I feel the cocking system is even more durable than that in the vet 1. When I get one as the funds allow, I'll be able to say with certainty.
madeintheuk - I had an Edgun R5M, IMHO it was not in the same class as the Vet1 as far as refinement, cocking, shot cycle, etc. It's a tough gun for sure, but I found it no pleasure to shoot. But that's Me. Lastly, I don't recall the Edgun having any type of anti double load either. You are your own man of course, and I'm not lobbying for Taipan, but jumping to another brand that is similar in features out of protest may end up leaving you unfulfilled. With gun resales sucking currently, I'd say wait a bit and study closer your options. Yes, I do miss the anti double load feature, but I won't let it keep me off a rather impressive looking gun.