I can guarantee you that if they had to send these rifles out for 100% testing it would add thousands of dollars to the end price. Each component would be tested independently than as a system. Normally several units are sent and tested and report generated and modifications made. How many iterations are you willing to pay for to ensure you get a 100% working unit? What kind of life expectancy should they design for? How long of a warranty should be offered?
You have release what you have at a certain level or you'll never sell one and the doors will be closed.
Smitty
I expect to get EXACTLY what I paid for. And I expect it to work EXACTLY as it is advertised , nothing more and nothing less. You can sugar coat it anyway that makes you feel better.BUT I do believe there are others that share the same sentiment about buying any air rifle that performs below what is advertised or expected from any manufacturer..then to be told it's all ok, that's just how things like this go, we have just a few minor glitches to work out and we can't possibly make sure it's ready for prime time before we start selling the product, BECAUSE taking the time to make sure all the bugs are worked out before being released...would bankrupt the company and shut its doors or add thousands of dollars to the cost of the rifle. C'mon REALLY?
Not trying to start a pissing contest, but I'm not sure what your reaching for, things go wrong, ever bought a New Car? New Home? Appliances? Voted for a President?
There are way too many examples of products coming out on the market too soon, I bought a Cannondale Speed ATV, for around $8,500 in 2002. It had bearing issues with the Crank (using a Suzuki rod bearing with one extra roller solved the problem). I was fully aware that it was a newer company, and had many FIRST TIMES for an ATV. At the time it out performed Honda, Suzuki, Bombardier, etc. etc.
You have to start selling products at some point, 100 samples, 1,000 samples, 10,000 sample size before you release a product? I'm not aware of any product that has ever been release which was Perfect, that's why they have a warranty. Say they did in house or sent it to a company like mine to test, they send 10 samples, once they are ready for Qualification (Who knows what those numbers are). They (we) put them through all the design parameters and they pass 100% each test with no issues. They start sending them out to clients. Most people realize there is something in electronics called "infant mortality", that out of a certain number of pieces (IIRC 2%) those parts will fail within the first 30 days. One of the reasons that most electronics have a 90 day warranty. Luther Walter Barrels, they have made probably hundreds of thousands of barrels, do they all shoot sub MOA? What about mechanical tolerance stack, ever get a product that had parts on both ends of that little issue?
The advertisement - From the Daystate Website "
THE DELTA WOLF
THE MOST ADVANCED AIRGUN OF ALL TIME
Delta Wolf is the air rifle of the future, here today… and future-proofed for tomorrow. Delta Wolf is the first Daystate to adopt an advanced tactical form factor that has proven popular with shooters across multiple disciplines. Delta Wolf is the first ‘smart’ airgun that can automatically adjust to suit the shooter’s needs."
So which part of their advertisement wasn't lived up to? Future Proofed? I believe the Firmware/Software can be updated - Met. Advanced Tactical Form - True and Popular - Met. "Smart" airgun that can automatically adjust to suit shooter's need? Built in Chrono, programmable FPS based on pellet weight - Met
Do some of them have issues? Sure
Are they being repaired, replace or returned? If so, well than I don't know what to say, Daystate seems to be taking care of the issue.
I can tell you in all honesty, as someone who is actively trying to launch their own product, that it takes large numbers of different people using a product to find all the bugs to be worked out. The product I'm working on, is as good as I know how to make it, with all the testing of Aerospace, Telcomm, Commerial, etc. I've gathered I still won't know if it's 100% and requires no further revisions until it's been in the field for a year or two. So should I continue to work on it or put it into production? I've already spent well over 6 figures getting it to the point where it works incredibly well. Or spend another two years drop $200,000 for tooling and then another $50,000 for test units to be given away and reviewed?
Smitty