The Priest - PCP similar to Impact fom Slovenia

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Have you even looked at the reviews? I am going to guess, no. Subsequent 100 yard outings have not been as bad as the first. I average about 2 inch to 2.5 inch 10 shot groups at 100 yards. That is just me though. I can't really get proper eye relief and shoulder placement/cheek weld in the prone with bags and that is how I shoot at 100. All things being equal I shoot like steve does in the RAW .30 review and he got 2.5inch groups at 100 not compensating for wind. Mind you, that isn't too bad. Most shots I take while hunting, are off hand at a range of <40 yards and for that it is wonderful. I think it is a very good gun especially for its price and capability. Are there better out there, probably. But they aren't as small and easy to point off hand. Overall, I like it a lot. You be the judge for yourself.
 
Upvote 0
i don t think they will have a new priest before a long time..it s their first gun and they need to back money on their new society
it will be great to have more feedback here! 
more distance shooting(60-70-80m) and check if it is accurate gun!
bad point if i understand:loud gun
hard coking
regulator noise(but i don t undersand how it could be noise)
 
Upvote 0
I have number 34 in .22. Out to 60 yards with bipod no rear bag, I can cover a full mag, 12 shots, JSB 18.1g with a quarter. Just as accurate as my Vulcan. I can confirm that the priest is louder than my .22 Vulcan 890 fps with JSB 18.1g vs the Priest, 920 fps with same ammo.

The cocking is hard, not smooth but not hard like what some people are saying, racking a 50 cal. There's a lot of spring tension. But quickly able to get use to it after a few rounds.

The Mag is a pain in the rear to load, not user friendly at all. I have to insert the pellet and then push it further in with a pen to have it seated and cycle to the next open slot. Without a tool, I don't see how you can seat the pellet. It just makes loading the magazine that much more time consuming.

Overall, it's a pretty nice gun. If you want to reduce the weight then a CF bottle is the way to go. No complaints other than the Mag.
 
Upvote 0
Boombots74I have number 34 in .22. Out to 60 yards with bipod no rear bag, I can cover a full mag, 12 shots, JSB 18.1g with a quarter. Just as accurate as my Vulcan. I can confirm that the priest is louder than my .22 Vulcan 890 fps with JSB 18.1g vs the Priest, 920 fps with same ammo.

The cocking is hard, not smooth but not hard like what some people are saying, racking a 50 cal. There's a lot of spring tension. But quickly able to get use to it after a few rounds.

The Mag is a pain in the rear to load, not user friendly at all. I have to insert the pellet and then push it further in with a pen to have it seated and cycle to the next open slot. Without a tool, I don't see how you can seat the pellet. It just makes loading the magazine that much more time consuming.

Overall, it's a pretty nice gun. If you want to reduce the weight then a CF bottle is the way to go. No complaints other than the Mag.
Click to expand...


Try seating the pellet just far enough to be able to spin the drum and give the mag a little love tap on the table. That should get the head past the o ring. Works like a charm.

BTW. The .50 cal thing was an exaggeration. I hope that was obvious. Anyways I am here to tell you it gets much better quite quickly. I am loving mine.

If you ever empty the tank do me a favor and check the washer stack. I'd like to know the thickness, quantity, and orientation of the stack. Mine in .25 is different from yours. Thanks in advanced.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Resources
Menu