Got mine finally. Serial number in the 200's so guessing there are over 200 other owners out there. I'm betting the majority are not forum users and that's why the there's little info out there so far. Even so that's about 200 more Hammers out there than 50 cal Texans since they just started shipping. Either way I don't understand the hate for the Hammer. Yes it took too long but I feel the product recieved is better for it. I could have canceled my Hammer and bought an Airforce Texan 50 or even converted my own years ago but that's not what I wanted. I wanted at least 500fpe with a flat trajectory and a quick follow up shot. I was happy waiting. Personally I think $1200 is over priced for a Texan but people are buying them. Not once have I gotten on a Texan thread and bashed it. No need. It's not for me so I just kept quiet. Hell, if I needed to comment in every thread that included a gun I didn't care for I wouldn't have time to breath. I think if the gun is not for you, why not just move on to the next thread that is. I guess that's just me. Anyway, back to the Hammer. I videoed the unboxing and will have that up this week on YouTube. I am still waiting on a few more slugs and then it's range day. I will be video documenting the process. Hopefully I held out and the wait was worth it.
I don't mean to step in anything here, but I think the resentment about the Hammer is a little deeper than simply thinking it mechanically is or isn't all it is cracked up to be. I think a lot of the resentment ultimately just boils down to being lied to about something they cared about. A LOT of people wanted a Hammer when they were first announced, it was a pretty tasty package at a great price. But to be lied to over and over and over again about release timelines I think quite reasonably leaves a pretty sour taste in a lot of mouths. Take this thread, nobody has one in their hands yet, and it is seven pages long and is far from the only thread on this gun. Clearly there has been some substantial anticipation for this product.
And, in a way, that is a good thing. Deceit is only rejected in a just society, and a just society remains that way because the collective attacks the deceitful even though they personally may not have been financially harmed. Umarex, unambiguously and repeatedly, promised timelines which they did not, and knew they could not, meet. (lets just say I know a guy) And they did this both to their dealers/distributors, and to their customers. Quite honestly, that kind of behavior is deserving of rebuke. It also, quite rightfully in my eyes, casts doubt on the whole of their credibility. And that means the rest of their marketing claims used to sell the rifles. There is no other way around it, this company spent three years systematically undermining their own credibility.
I'm not saying any of this to criticize the gun mechanically, but nor am I saying it to criticize people who want one and bought one. I guess what I'm really getting at that, just as the supporters of the Hammer were patient and understanding with Umarex, perhaps that should also extend to the frustrations of the community they wronged.
I really hope that seems reasonable and makes sense.