So I had a good email correspondence with Nick from NSA ammo regarding undersized slugs, and perhaps consideration of swagging a slug in .221 since that's the groove diameter of the Lothar Walther barrels that 95% of gun manufacturers use. I explained the issue with air escaping around the grooves of the barrel when using an undersized slug, and how it can negatively impact accuracy as well as waste energy. He didn't seem to question that. But he did enlighten me on something I hadn't though about, and obviously he's done the research on.... It has to do 100% with choked barrels.
So here's the deal. I guess even though the slug is smaller than the groove diameter at the breech, it chokes down to .218 near the muzzle. Nick said that choked LW barrels hate .220 and .221 slugs. But they seem to love .218. He said that the Daystate rifles love .217 slugs. Again, utilizing a choked barrel.
He agreed that if you're using an un-choked barrel, that you should get better accuracy from a slug that concentrically seals in the grooves. If you have a un-choked LW barrel in .22, then the gun will like slugs in .221. If you have an un-choked LW barrel in .25, it will like slugs in .254. I'm not opposed to using a choked barrel. I'm opposed to the twist rates they typically use. The twist rates are great for pellets, but not for slugs. They create only marginal stability. Using the 35gr MP-Molds .22 slug, my gun with a LW barrel utilizing a twist of 1:17.7 is only marginally stable. But using my un-choked Russian Federation barrel with a 1:16 twist, the stability increases significantly.
But Nick has a business to run. And I understand that the production of the slugs needs to justify the initial investment. And the demographic of air rifle shooters that are using un-choked .22 and .25 barrels is very small. So I don't think he's interested. And frankly, I can't blame him. So I think I'm going to go to Arsenal Molds and see if I can have a custom mold made from a slug I design. I want the slug to be .221 and weigh 30-32gr. I want it to have drive bands that minimize friction. I've already drawn something up. I'll see if Jared at Arsenal will be willing to make it for me. I already have the MP-Molds .22 slug that fits very nicely in my barrel. But I think I can come up with a design that's more stable.
So I suppose this is the question- the dilemma. Is it worth converting you rifle to slugs and getting a custom barrel, but potentially not being able to achieve your goal of maximum stability and accuracy by using the mass produced slugs available that are designed for choked barrels? Is it worth the cost to purchase a mold to cast your own slugs in the proper size, or have a custom mold made to fit your barrel? Especially in a small caliber. But if you can design a proper slug, it can potentially be game changing!
Thoughts?
So here's the deal. I guess even though the slug is smaller than the groove diameter at the breech, it chokes down to .218 near the muzzle. Nick said that choked LW barrels hate .220 and .221 slugs. But they seem to love .218. He said that the Daystate rifles love .217 slugs. Again, utilizing a choked barrel.
He agreed that if you're using an un-choked barrel, that you should get better accuracy from a slug that concentrically seals in the grooves. If you have a un-choked LW barrel in .22, then the gun will like slugs in .221. If you have an un-choked LW barrel in .25, it will like slugs in .254. I'm not opposed to using a choked barrel. I'm opposed to the twist rates they typically use. The twist rates are great for pellets, but not for slugs. They create only marginal stability. Using the 35gr MP-Molds .22 slug, my gun with a LW barrel utilizing a twist of 1:17.7 is only marginally stable. But using my un-choked Russian Federation barrel with a 1:16 twist, the stability increases significantly.
But Nick has a business to run. And I understand that the production of the slugs needs to justify the initial investment. And the demographic of air rifle shooters that are using un-choked .22 and .25 barrels is very small. So I don't think he's interested. And frankly, I can't blame him. So I think I'm going to go to Arsenal Molds and see if I can have a custom mold made from a slug I design. I want the slug to be .221 and weigh 30-32gr. I want it to have drive bands that minimize friction. I've already drawn something up. I'll see if Jared at Arsenal will be willing to make it for me. I already have the MP-Molds .22 slug that fits very nicely in my barrel. But I think I can come up with a design that's more stable.
So I suppose this is the question- the dilemma. Is it worth converting you rifle to slugs and getting a custom barrel, but potentially not being able to achieve your goal of maximum stability and accuracy by using the mass produced slugs available that are designed for choked barrels? Is it worth the cost to purchase a mold to cast your own slugs in the proper size, or have a custom mold made to fit your barrel? Especially in a small caliber. But if you can design a proper slug, it can potentially be game changing!
Thoughts?