G
Guest
Guest
Tin is too hard, will not sufficiently obturate to fill the grooves.
Pure tin is actually softer than pure lead...
Upvote 0
Tin is too hard, will not sufficiently obturate to fill the grooves.
I was going from data in an old bullet casting manual. If it's wrong, I apologize for the bad information.
How about a round nose boat tail slug that has a BC of .15 in lead? It's 48 grain bc .15. Can you estimate for a tin slug of the same size with a weight of 31 grains?
For the same weight, the BC will increase as the caliber decreases. This is because BC increases as sectional density, SD, (weight/caliber) increases and SD increase as caliber decreases at a constant weight.
Thanks. The slug i posted a pic of was designed/tested etc. to shoot out of LW choked .25 barrels in older huben k1, and stable at a range of velocities out of that gun. Worth taking a look at and I never see folks posting about these slugs.
I find they are only inaccurate below 650 FPS I think but otherwise as good as any I can buy out of my airforce barrels at my level of shooting skill which is "advanced plinker" at best.
https://www.mp-molds.com/product/635-mm-air-rifle-pellet-8-cav-mold/
.. It shoots 50 grain slugs at over 1000 FPS. How fast would a 16 grain lead free diablo shoot? And what would it's trajectory be?
...... How else to explain people shooting 22 LR right around the speed of sound with plenty of stability over long ranges? Bullet shape I believe
...
scotchmo - Makes sense, thank you.
- interesting post on projectiles - nice work on that... Of course the idea that the air itself becomes a large part of the equation at those kind of velocities I hadn't thought of and it makes sense that there would be a rapidly diminishing return.
What is the source of the mold that casts those slugs?
If you want to shoot with really high speeds and high BC value your only change is to shoot sabots out from big bore and preferably use helium.
...