Do you size those down to .25 or are you shooting with a .257 barrel?
Sorry this confused me, I know it’s old but. The fast the bullet travels don’t the fpe increase?Also don't forget that shooting a 16gr pellet at the same tune as a 60gr slug your pellet will be out the bore way faster being much lower in fpe compared to the slug. So it might not shoot as fast as you hope.
The longer a bullet is in a barrel the more time the energy of the air has to work on it. So a very light projectile zips out of the barrel so quickly that the force is not applied for a long enough time to add a whole heck of a lot of energy.
That’s what I was thinking, I know the length of barrel affect velocity, which intern affects foot pounds of energy. But that one confused me! Here’s another good question. At least it’s a good one to me. If we have airguns that push a cal 230 grain slug up to 900fps, why are there no 22, 25cal on the market that can push a 30-80grain slug up to velocities of 1300-1600 fps. Other than the whole instability thing. I have 25 cal pcp that hits 1190fps with 19.95grain h&n barracuda green lead free. That’s the best number I’ve ever gotten typically that just one shot in a string the rest 1160-1165. I don’t see a stability issue. And get quarter size groups at 30-40 yards and half dollar at 75-100yards with a couple flyers here and there. FX M3 in 25cal max power.FPE development comes from force x distance, it’s not force x time.
Force is (pressure x bore_area).
Maximum distance available is barrel length.
Though actual distance and pressure is related to how quickly and how long the valve stays open.
For a valve that opens for only a short time period, the lower mass projectile will have higher FPE, since it travels a longer distance while under full pressure.
For a valve that opens fast, with full ports, and stays open, the heavier projectile will have a higher FPE because the proportion of air mass to projectile mass is lower.
FPE development comes from force x distance, it’s not force x time.
Force is (pressure x bore_area).
Maximum distance available is barrel length.
Though actual distance and pressure is related to how quickly and how long the valve stays open.
For a valve that opens for only a short time period, the lower mass projectile will have higher FPE, since it travels a longer distance while under full pressure.
For a valve that opens fast, with full ports, and stays open, the heavier projectile will have a higher FPE because the proportion of air mass to projectile mass is lower.
I did a similar experiment years ago with a powder burner and the lighter projectiles were moving through the barrel so fast that they couldn't obtain the needed twist to stabilize in flight. They were fouling in the lands and grooves and a shotgun pattern would have been an improvement. I am by no means an expert but I do learn from my mistakes. So in the name of experimentation by all means give it a go and let us know how it turns out. Lots of things look great on paper or in theory but just don't pan out when applied to real life.Imho, all the responses state parts of the problem, and elh does a great job putting the pieces together. However, his statement about leading is absolutely correct and often overlooked. Years ago I had a FT rifle built that shot 7.9 CPs (the original "good" ones) at 1025 fps. It shot laser flat and would consistently produce the smallest groups I have ever shot. The first time out, my card looked like "the chicken walk" dropping only a couple for my best ever score. But during the afternoon relay it all fell apart. Fellow shooter, Brit Harrision,advised me that the problem was leading - and he was right. In fewer than 100 shots, the barrel leaded up giving shotgun patterns. Thoroughly cleaning the bore dialed the accuracy back. Cannot imagine the amount of fouling that would occur in a rifled barrel at the velocities contemplated here.
If my brain wondered it, it would already know… Go shoot n seeI have a .25 airforce that shoots 60 grain slugs at up to 130 fpe. I know pellets lose stability when shot close to the speed of sound because of the behavior of air at these velocities. But I recall seeing some graphs posted showing that projectiles can achieve a good deal of stability once you get well past the speed of sound, and it's just shooting right near the sound barrier that's the biggest problem.
so first, is this true? Diablo at 900 ft./s is stable but it's unstable at around 1200, but would it be stable at 1600fps since it is a good number of FPS above the sound barrier?
I ask because I was wondering what would happen if I shot a very light lead free pellet with this gun at full power. It shoots 50 grain slugs at over 1000 FPS. How fast would a 16 grain lead free diablo shoot? And what would it's trajectory be?
Sometimes others just like typing what they've heard.well that is one way to go… sometimes it makes sense to learn from the wisdom of others
That’s not what I said. A projectile will indeed gain FPE the longer (time) that you apply force, as long as it is free to move. However, if it does not accelerate very far (distance) down the barrel under pressure, it won’t gain much FPE.Very well explained, I was just trying to keep it simple. So you are saying it’s not correct to say that the longer you apply a force to an object the more you’re able to alter its KE?
Not really, only if you can incrementally increase the force. Granted barrel length with increase fps in turn increases fpe. But only to the extent of the amount of inertia created by said force or the amount of energy that that force produces. At some point it will reach a point that the energy and the amount of force it creates is equal and can no longer accelerate any faster than what it’s already traveling. No scientist but I think it has something to do with conservation of energy.That’s not what I said. A projectile will indeed gain FPE the longer (time) that you apply force, as long as it is free to move. However, if it does not accelerate very far (distance) down the barrel under pressure, it won’t gain much FPE.