What is Ballistic Coefficient?

Michael

Administrator
Staff member
Complimentary info from Airgun Depot

1568751099_10729138865d813dfb482e93.50600159_Screen Shot 2019-09-17 at 3.11.17 PM.png

All About Ballistic Coefficient

By [url="https://www.airgundepot.com/admin-article.html"]Airgun Depot
 | Published Hard Air Magazine, or you will need to do your own testing.

To figure out the BC of your pellet of choice you will need either a chronograph or a Doppler radar and since you are more likely to own a chronograph than a radar that is what we will cover.

The basic process is to measure the velocity of the pellet at two distances and then plug the numbers into our ballistics calculator. If you have only one chronograph place it a couple of yards in front of your shooting bench and shoot a number of pellets through it. (If you are using a PCP either tether it or refill to the same pressure frequently so that you get the most consistent results possible.) Take the average of the shots. Now move the chronograph down range and repeat the process. (Don’t shoot the chronograph!) Measure the distance between the two locations and put the distances and the velocities into our ballistic calculator and there you go!

If you have two chronographs it is a bit easier. First, make sure they are calibrated by putting them end to end and firing some pellets through them. The velocities shown by the second chronograph should be just a little lower than the first. Then switch the two chronographs around and check that the results are the same. Now the process is the same as with one chronograph, but you don’t need to take the average of a number of shots through the first chronograph and compare it to an average of shots through the second. Instead, plug in the two velocities of each shot.

Can bad BC be good?

As we saw above, a good BC means that a projectile will have a longer effective range, retaining both power and accuracy at longer distances, but is this always a good thing? While you might think the answer is an obvious yes, the answer is actually a definite no! In fact, one of the real advantages of an airgun over a firearm is that pellets lose their energy very quickly, making them much safer to use in urban environments. This is not to say that you don’t need to be conscious of your backstops or what is behind your target because you sure do, but consider this example: A 7gr Hobby pellet traveling at 800 fps at the muzzle putting out over 10 fpe only retains about 1.5 foot-pounds of energy (for comparison, the Red Ryder BB gun puts out about 1fpe) at 100 yards while a 22lr bullet can retain up to 15fpe at 1000 yards. If you are pesting in your backyard, for instance, or in a barn or a feedlot, the fact that the pellet is going to quickly shed energy is a very good thing.

How do you get the best possible BC with your airgun?

Shoot slugs! Because of their shape and sectional density, slugs have a much better BC than pellets do, but they also have drawbacks. First, they don’t have a flared backside s they need gyroscopic stabilization and many airguns, especially springers and CO2 guns, don’t have the power to shoot them fast enough to get sufficient spin stabilization to make them accurate. Second, they are more expensive. Third, their better BC makes them less fit for shooting in urban environments. Fourth, most slugs aren’t as accurate as pellets.

One last consideration is the fact that a good BC does not mean that the pellet is going to be more accurate"that has to do with a lot of other factors.

Some Complications

Now that you have the gist of ballistic coefficient and how to calculate it we’ll add the fine print.

As mentioned above, there are many factors that affect BC so that it is never exact. For example, BCs change with velocity, so a listed BC of a bullet or a pellet is only really meaningful if you know at what velocity the projectile was measured. Bullets tend to have a better BC the faster they are going and a worse BC as they begin to slow down, but a pellet’s BC is generally the opposite. A pellet is going to slow down a lot faster in the 1000-800 fps range, and thus have a worse BC than it will in the 600-400 fps range. For example, JSB Beasts in .22 has a BC of 0.038 when measured with a muzzle velocity of 920 fps. This is a great BC for a pellet! However, starting with a muzzle velocity of 790 fps they have a BC of 0.054, which is the best we’ve ever seen!

Other factors such as temperature, elevation above sea level, barometric pressure, and even the idiosyncrasies of individual barrels also affect BC, but these are minor enough that we won’t go into them here.

One thing that complicates BC calculations is that they are done in relation to a standard model. For bullets the two most common standards are the G1 and G7 models, but pellets are so different that they have their own standard, the GA. A ballistic standard such as the G1 or GA is a model of a projectile shape from which the drag and BC can be calculated. The G1 is a model of a short, flat-bottomed bullet, while the G7 is for longer boat-tailed bullets. The GA is a standard domed pellet.
 
Hard Air Magazine has also published the most comprehensive, comparable, independent database of pellet Ballistic Coefficients. It includes BCs in .177 caliber, .22 cal, .25 and .30 caliber.

This data will help if you want to know typical BC values for your pellets, but don’t have the time or resources to derive that data. 

Airgun pellet Ballistic Coefficients are a great aid to accurate shooting at different ranges. They are valuable to the knowledgeable airgun hunter and Field Target competitor. In conjunction with a program such as Chairgun, BCs can be used to accurately estimate pellet drop downrange. 

http://hardairmagazine.com/ballistic-coefficients/

So “Bookmark” this page, their page, or just click the header when you visit the Pellets, Projectiles & Ammo section.

Many Thanks to Stephen & his team for spending countless hours putting the pellets you buy to the test!
 
So what is the BC of P.Polymag 0.30@600fps?

The BC has nothing to do with the velocity, and everything to do with the sectional density and shape of the projectile. The SG (stability factor) would take BC and combine it with velocity and twist, but the BC is it's own entity. 

The P.Polymag's BC will be the same regardless of the velocity. I do understand the jest of the question though. I'm assuming you want the BC of the .30 Polymag, period. 
 
So what is the BC of P.Polymag 0.30@600fps?

The BC has nothing to do with the velocity, and everything to do with the sectional density and shape of the projectile. The SG (stability factor) would take BC and combine it with velocity and twist, but the BC is it's own entity. 

The P.Polymag's BC will be the same regardless of the velocity. I do understand the jest of the question though. I'm assuming you want the BC of the .30 Polymag, period.

I've always viewed it the same way but it seems many will disagree. I've read many times how it depends on "drag model" chosen and how BC varies with velocity. My view was that BC was a SIMPLE calculation based on shape and sectional density only, as you stated. Still a calculation (estimation) of the physical property of the projectile, but a static one for that projectile. I'm certainly not a ballistician and not even a mathematician so I don't know which is accurate. One thing I do firmly believe is that the more complicated it becomes the less useful it would be. At some point you just need to shoot to know.
 
The BC is a nice approximate best guess, but it changes for any given shape based on the velocity range it is being measured across, as in the example given in the article. The purpose we use the BC for is to create a range card. So why not do that first? Establish targets at several distances on a level range using a bench and a common aim point adjusting each target with a drawn horizontal line established with a laser. This process takes all the factors in consideration and directly gives you the result. From the measured distance and measured drop, you have your range card.
 
Having used powder burners for years, the G7 ballistic coefficient provides a drop chart which is extremely close to what I find in reality at my local 600 yard range using Long Boat tail bullets.

Shooting my RTI Prophet performance in 10 yard increments out to 210 yards I found that the G1 ballistic coefficient was very close to the actual drops I was getting, where the G7 was not. The G1 is made for flat base bullets.

34g .250 h&n slug 955fps 
 
Hi

From JSB Facebook page, official JSB BC's for their pellets:

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3309783369068674&set=pcb.3309794485734229

120894621_3309783372402007_2074318723244216052_n.1631696127.jpg


I have found of the most of the heavier .22 to be spot on in my guns, or at least very close.



Cheers.
 
It seems BC should be of extreme importance to airgun hunters in particular as a higher BC, with accurate ammo, can both stretch your range and offer better terminal effect as energy at range is generally higher.

For me, I use the heaviest, highest BC pellet or slug available that can deliver both reasonable speed (time to target) and accuracy. I would choose a heavy, accurate, high BC round nose pellet or slug over a lower BC hollow point pellet or slug with the same accuracy when hunting beyond 20 yards.

Milehighguy