Hatsan What is the diameter of the transfer port on the Hatsan 125 FAC and have you seen anything this unusual?

C.ool thing. Those interchangeable pressure nozzles.
I made the very same, drilling out M6 grub screws with 2.5 to 3.8 mm holes to insert into the HW80.
But at widening the original TP I stopped at 3.3 (not much of a difference there) and 3.9 mm to test intermediately and find out that those 3.9 mm are for no good and the original 3 mm seemed to do best.
So I didn't continue till 5 mm (to machine out the M6 threads) but reduced the 3.9 mm back to 3.0 mm by pressing in the proper brass tubelet.
Maybe anyone has already thought about altering the TP diameter size. Usually not too much to gain there. Quite the opposite, the Diana TPs of 4 mm do better when reduced to 3 mm as well in terms of piston slam, shooting consistency and pellet speed
Doubt that the 0.25 calibre needs a larger TP diameter than the smaller caliber.

By the way what stroke length has the 135/ Webley Patriot?
What did you glue your inserts with?
 
Until you know the stroke ,tube size and piston weight ..
port work is a shot in the dark

Ive made 4 prototype break barrels of my own , 35 to 20:ft lbs. and ,have mucked up many tubes and time.. it’s not a waste as what I learned cost both.. knowledge is power …
longer stroke guns need a bit bigger port. That being said, they also need mass to tame spring return and to slow the piston advance..
Tuning a 12 ft lb gun vrs a 20 plus ft lb gun is worlds different.

Short stroke guns with big tubes like the Hw 80/35 , bsa lightning need smaller ports to generate the heat transfer cycle..
The Hw 80 as rewarding of a lifetime it’s had was great but still lacked a bit of refinement

96 mm stroke , 400 gram piston, proper made seal, not a parachute, and 3.9 mm port will net you the smoothest 25 ft lb dead blow shot cycle in any hunting gun you will have shot
 
I'd like to know the stoke length of a Webley Patriot. while beeing quite aware of the 80's stroke and piston. Yet the right TP is guesswork to find, it's rather experience.
I don't think that the longer stroke needs a larger TP, a bigger swept volume is rather able to cope with a too large TP.
It's not just the diameter it's, as much the length, say the issue is dead or lost volume of the TP, so the optimum diameter depends very much on the TP length, the longer it is the smaller the diameter must be, Try the 3.0 mm once, I bet it'll do fine and better than the 3.9 mm
So you made a HW80 with 96 mm stroke? This really can be a cool, powerful rifle half the way to the Webley Patriot.
I machined the stroke of a HW 35 up to 80 mm for this is the big flaw of the 35, its short stroke (and long pressure nozzle). A pity it worked properly for just a few shooting cycles, the cylinder extension had 30.3 instead of 30 mm diameter and the air broke through any seal after a while each time. But before I can confirm, the cycle was very smooth and the power output at about 16 ftlb @ 0.177
It was the 35 with 35 piston and 35 spring, 80 mm stroke and 10 mm TP length. Properly machined it could be my very favourite rifle, at moment it's just a remainder to a failed project.

And yes, you're right, powerful springers quite differ from such German popguns at 5.5 ftlb. (At that power not even a decent popgun )

And in general the proper caliber must be found for the action part. HW 80 and 35 as well as Diana 52 must have 0.22" everything else is a waste of metal. (The 35 can do fine at 0.177 but it's made for the larger caliber). Ther're so many good rifles out there which do well at 0.177" no need to restrain a HW 80 so badly.

Guess what people do. They machine down HW 80, 35 and Diana 52 pistons for less weight and short stroke them for that they do as smoothly as the HW 50 @ 12 ftlb or the 30 @ 5.5 ftlb. Pretty sure these rifles were not designed to be subject to such a castration.
Ok, the Germs when they're not allowed to exceed their 5.5 ftlbs they can hold a heavy gun at least.
 
Last edited:
Until you know the stroke ,tube size and piston weight ..
port work is a shot in the dark

Ive made 4 prototype break barrels of my own , 35 to 20:ft lbs. and ,have mucked up many tubes and time.. it’s not a waste as what I learned cost both.. knowledge is power …
longer stroke guns need a bit bigger port. That being said, they also need mass to tame spring return and to slow the piston advance..
Tuning a 12 ft lb gun vrs a 20 plus ft lb gun is worlds different.

Short stroke guns with big tubes like the Hw 80/35 , bsa lightning need smaller ports to generate the heat transfer cycle..
The Hw 80 as rewarding of a lifetime it’s had was great but still lacked a bit of refinement

96 mm stroke , 400 gram piston, proper made seal, not a parachute, and 3.9 mm port will net you the smoothest 25 ft lb dead blow shot cycle in any hunting gun you will have shot
Tonight I will measure all these parameters
 
I'd like to know the stoke length of a Webley Patriot. while beeing quite aware of the 80's stroke and piston. Yet the right TP is guesswork to find, it's rather experience.
I don't think that the longer stroke needs a larger TP, a bigger swept volume is rather able to cope with a too large TP.
It's not just the diameter it's, as much the length, say the issue is dead or lost volume of the TP, so the optimum diameter depends very much on the TP length, the longer it is the smaller the diameter must be, Try the 3.0 mm once, I bet it'll do fine and better than the 3.9 mm
So you made a HW80 with 96 mm stroke? This really can be a cool, powerful rifle half the way to the Webley Patriot.
I machined the stroke of a HW 35 up to 80 mm for this is the big flaw of the 35, its short stroke (and long pressure nozzle). A pity it worked properly for just a few shooting cycles, the cylinder extension had 30.3 instead of 30 mm diameter and the air broke through any seal after a while each time. But before I can confirm, the cycle was very smooth and the power output at about 16 ftlb @ 0.177
It was the 35 with 35 piston and 35 spring, 80 mm stroke and 10 mm TP length. Properly machined it could be my very favourite rifle, at moment it's just a remainder to a failed project.

And yes, you're right, powerful springers quite differ from such German popguns at 5.5 ftlb. (At that power not even a decent popgun )

And in general the proper caliber must be found for the action part. HW 80 and 35 as well as Diana 52 must have 0.22" everything else is a waste of metal. (The 35 can do fine at 0.177 but it's made for the larger caliber). Ther're so many good rifles out there which do well at 0.177" no need to restrain a HW 80 so badly.
The length of the transfer port on this Hatsan 125 is 12-13 mm, diameter 3.9 on the cylinder, this insert diameter 4 mm...
 
I'm also thinking about honing the cylinder of the compression chamber, but... I will damage the protective metal and then corrosion will occur. Why aren't the factories honing the cylinder and barrel, installing plastic rings on the piston, better spring guides and other fine processing, it doesn't cost them much and they wouldn't be so embarrassed, Hatsan has disastrous locks on the barrel. I don't know where the Walther LGU Varmint is made (400 euros not much if it is made in Germany) but it has a great price and should be the standard for all spring airguns.
 
Until you know the stroke ,tube size and piston weight ..
port work is a shot in the dark

Ive made 4 prototype break barrels of my own , 35 to 20:ft lbs. and ,have mucked up many tubes and time.. it’s not a waste as what I learned cost both.. knowledge is power …
longer stroke guns need a bit bigger port. That being said, they also need mass to tame spring return and to slow the piston advance..
Tuning a 12 ft lb gun vrs a 20 plus ft lb gun is worlds different.

Short stroke guns with big tubes like the Hw 80/35 , bsa lightning need smaller ports to generate the heat transfer cycle..
The Hw 80 as rewarding of a lifetime it’s had was great but still lacked a bit of refinement

96 mm stroke , 400 gram piston, proper made seal, not a parachute, and 3.9 mm port will net you the smoothest 25 ft lb dead blow shot cycle in any hunting gun you will have shot
Piston weight is 440 grams, compression chamber diameter is 29 mm, piston stroke is 117 mm, TP is 3.9 mm - 4 mm. The main spring is 360 mm long, wire thickness 3.6 mm, 48 windings, i.e. 46 active, OD about 21.6 mm
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maker's Marksman
This is a new OEM Hatsan spring that was 440mm long, stayed cocked overnight and shrunk to 360mm.
It just got set "scragged".

Kinda like said here

https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2012/03/resizing-a-mainspring/

Arh for a small fee will preset the spring you order as well

Most just do like yours and put it in and leave it cocked overnight...

I do the scragging thing myself I find makes compressing / install easier and less chance you kink a new spring (opinion)
 
It just got set "scragged".

Kinda like said here

https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2012/03/resizing-a-mainspring/

Arh for a small fee will preset the spring you order as well

Most just do like yours and put it in and leave it cocked overnight...

I do the scragging thing myself I find makes compressing / install easier and less chance you kink a new spring (opinion)
I know about it but this is too big of a reduction, about 5% reduction would be reasonable. Quality springs are already stabilized and long max. load does not affect its characteristics...
 
setspring.jpg
I think a new unset vs a set form my pile , but you get some " shrinkage".

Also with the set spring I don't have to fight in that extra inch or 2 to get it in the gun ..lol
 
Hatsan 135 30mm piston 120mm stroke
Tp 4x 14

Hatsan 125 29mm piston 120mm stroke
Tp 4x14

Patriot uk 30mm piston 114mm stroke
Tp 4x15
Gamo h1250 pro 29mm x 118mm
3.8 x 20
Theoben eli. 31.4mm x 100mm
Tp 4 x 6mm

Dual magnum 31.4 x130mm 2 stroke
Tp ?

Im made a h135 with 30 x 125mm
It do around 34 fpe .25
100kg gasram.
Tp 4mm
 
I have tuned a lot of Hatsan’s. They are a solid well designed (by Webley) airgun. Quality is a crap shoot. Probably a loosing proposition anymore. I’ve never seen this threaded port. I question if someone experimented on their gun and then returned it through a new one. It would be easy for Hatsan or a distributor to miss.
Hi bear,i think ya got that right" over look"