scraneCricket bullpup .22.
Based on what you've said in the past about what you like to shoot, I think a Cricket might be a good one for you to try if you ever wanted to give bullpups another chance ."Marksman3006"
"scrane"Cricket bullpup .22.
I wish someone close to me, Shreveport Louisiana, had a cricket for me to shoot. That is a scratch I would like to itch. Im not keeping count but there are alot of crickets here.
zebraBased on what you've said in the past about what you like to shoot, I think a Cricket might be a good one for you to try if you ever wanted to give bullpups another chance ."Marksman3006"
"scrane"Cricket bullpup .22.
I wish someone close to me, Shreveport Louisiana, had a cricket for me to shoot. That is a scratch I would like to itch. Im not keeping count but there are alot of crickets here.
The 25 has a similar feel to a rifle but with the benefits of a bullpup (at least to me). It has a substantial and steady base that makes it easier to shoot accurately from a bench than other bullpups I have tried. The only thing is that the 25 will probably be too loud for your taste unless you get a shroud extension. NC can add an end cap with a 1/2' UNF or whatever you need.
The 22 should be quiet enough for you and while it will be equally comfy up front (as it's the same), it's shorter and lighter overall so it's slightly harder to shoot. I would probably go with a Mutant in 22 over a Cricket.
Compared to the Daystates you are used to, you'll probably find the fit and finish disappointing on the Cricket. The metal work isn't as well done and the wood they use on their stocks is quite horrible compared to a Daystate (but the same can be said for most other brands). On the other hand, Crickets are more efficient with air and I prefer a side lever to a bolt action.
If you are someone who has to have a wood stock, I would recommend buying one from that Michal Osyda custom stock maker over the factory wood.
Yeah I usually remember everything anyone tells me... I usually remember more about what someone said than they do themselves..."Marksman3006"
"zebra"
Based on what you've said in the past about what you like to shoot, I think a Cricket might be a good one for you to try if you ever wanted to give bullpups another chance ."Marksman3006"
"scrane"Cricket bullpup .22.
I wish someone close to me, Shreveport Louisiana, had a cricket for me to shoot. That is a scratch I would like to itch. Im not keeping count but there are alot of crickets here.
The 25 has a similar feel to a rifle but with the benefits of a bullpup (at least to me). It has a substantial and steady base that makes it easier to shoot accurately from a bench than other bullpups I have tried. The only thing is that the 25 will probably be too loud for your taste unless you get a shroud extension. NC can add an end cap with a 1/2' UNF or whatever you need.
The 22 should be quiet enough for you and while it will be equally comfy up front (as it's the same), it's shorter and lighter overall so it's slightly harder to shoot. I would probably go with a Mutant in 22 over a Cricket.
Compared to the Daystates you are used to, you'll probably find the fit and finish disappointing on the Cricket. The metal work isn't as well done and the wood they use on their stocks is quite horrible compared to a Daystate (but the same can be said for most other brands). On the other hand, Crickets are more efficient with air and I prefer a side lever to a bolt action.
If you are someone who has to have a wood stock, I would recommend buying one from that Michal Osyda custom stock maker over the factory wood.
Thanks. Im laughing right now because you actually know me through the forum. Your right.....I do like daystates and rifles. lol
Im probably going to give a pup another chance tho. Designate it to shorter ranges and in .177. I just want something different without going larger than .22. Something that fills a different role than the wolverine.