"Marksman3006"IlThanks zebra. Im going to research the mutant shorty tonight in .177. As well as the cricket. To be honest.....I really dont care how well finished the stock etc are. I care about accuracy, quiet, and robust build with no poi shifting, no leaking. Im still in the research stage....I like this stage. I have the money right now. But I really enjoy the pursuit of knowledge and research. I never get in a hurry when researching a gun purchase.
This is why I wanted to ask everyone what theyre baby was, what they had the most confidence in. I couldnt care less about having the latest and greatest.....give me time tested and proven. I am fully capable of tinkering with my guns......but I much prefer to just shoot.....alot.....all the time.
I'm not talking about the quality of the finishing. I'm talking about the quality of the inletting and general robustness. These are things that play a part in accuracy.
There is a good powder burner blog I like to read where each year he gives you the lowdown on what the top 50 long range target shooters in America are using. There is a section on each component e.g. One on barrels, one on actions, one of stocks etc. One thing you notice straight away is that none of the top 50 are using the factory wood or plastic stocks because it directly effects their ability to shoot well. They all use high end hand made composite stocks or aluminum chassis systems.
For the best accuracy, you want a stock that is rigid, has inletting that fits precisely, has nothing to stress the action (which it can even in free float rifles), has proper balance and comfort for the shooter.
A flimsy flexible stock will cause poi shifts and make the gun extra hold sensative. I've done a lot of testing on this lately....
The Cricket synthetic stock is actually quite good. It's as rigid as plastic gets and very stable. It could use some aluminum pillars but you can add those yourself. The Cricket and Mutant wood stocks are not as good as they should be imo. The inletting on the Mutant stock needs work.
Don't get me wrong, the Mutant is accurate as it comes. It's just that I have seen a meaningful improvement when I switched out the stock for a rigid carbon fiber version with glassbedding and aluminum pillars. It certainly made it easier to shoot as I frequently forget to relax when taking hunting shots so I grip too hard...
The appearance is a different issue. I haven't seen nice wood on a factory Cricket, Mutant, Vulcan or Wildcat. To get that you need a custom job. The price of a Mutant plus a very nice custom Walnut stock is still competitive with the other PCP bullpups though. The Michal Osyda ones were around $300 (depending on the style and wood choice).
Btw, I don't think the Mutant is available in 177. I saw a 177 Mutant for sale in the classifieds a while ago but they had converted themselves or sent it to Ernest. Ernest posted pics of a 30 cal Mutant Shorty he did for someone so I am sure he could do a 177 for you.
I am not even sure if the 177 Cricket is still available. They used to sell a 177 Shorty Cricket that was very nice. You can probably find one used.
Personally, I would leave the Mutant Shorty as a 22. It's so quiet and accurate that there would be no benefit to making it 177 unless you planned to enter FT or BR matches (in which case you would want a different gun anyway). With the HST adjuster, you can take the power down pretty close to 177 levels with no further mods if you like.