Then there was the auction with the A.H. Hartley & Falcon HN-19.
I was going to be that buyer with more money than sense.
Didn't actually have to get crazy paid right around what they go for currently in England.
Many high bidders pay what could be considered, for lack of a better term, full retail for a perfectly healthy, fully functional and pristine example, for what turns out to be less than excellent examples that might need resealing, at least; or worse yet. Adding the price, time and/or effort involved to reseal or repair a gun with little to no parts availability within the cyberspace stratosphere exacerbates that common scenario. More often than not sellers auctioning anything with problems or issues 'fail' to be the most 'forthcoming' in their (purposely) vague descriptions.
Having lived such 'enlightening'
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Oops! :oops: :oops:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Sick :sick: :sick:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b842/9b8422590f712d94a53147b1830dcecef4d06461" alt="Face vomiting :face_vomiting: 🤮"
experiences more times than I care to share, I always consider worst-case scenarios to be likely reality in such situations.
To paraphrase, I can't afford many (more) pigs in a poke.
FWIW, I usually interrogate sellers relentlessly about condition, both seen and unseen, with my last question being,
"does it have ANY problems or issues of any kind we haven't discussed, be they functional or cosmetic?"
FYI, dishonest peddlers will nevertheless answer that pointed,
no wiggle-room question with a lie. Sometimes the only recourse becomes leaving negative feedback; but that beats no recourse at all, and is certainly justified. Correction- MORE than justified.
Happy bidding.
.