It has nothing to do with your opinion. You just act like aea is shot and your fx are just so much better. Those of us that hunt don't care about an extra cm of accuracy. What gun is on the podium means nothing to me and alot of others. I know my aea is dead accurate. I tell you what I'll post my accuracy at 100yds with the fpe that I'm shooting at and you do the same and well let the people asking about heavy slugs and hunting decide what gun they think is better for them. You might be shooting hole in hole but I bet my slugs will still be touching each other almost hole in hole with way more power than what your putting out and AF is nice but they are single shot. They only get about 5 shots max and the adjustability just doesn't match what can be done on other guns.Like I mentioned above you can get a used FX for the same or less than an AEA. I dont shoot matches either, but I brought that up since you will never ever ever see any AEA on the podium. Please post a video of your accuracy results, I dont think you will be anywhere close to an FX. I dont mind being wrong but so far its just your opinion vs mine, and I have experience with both brands.
I would never insist anyone needs to buy an FX over xyz, you can get a proven AF for less than an AEA. Those rifles have been taking down big game for decades and even the AEA cant keep up with their fpe numbers. And I will not stop posting my opinion, I wouldnt say that to you. IF you cant handle a differing opinion like an adult this might not be the forum for you.
Upvote 0