Which YouTubers give negative reviews?

Airguns of Alaska seems to give very unbiased reviews. I've seen him slam a couple of guns now.
Airgun Alley Miami seems to only give positive reviews and is into odd tactical airguns, but his testing protocols seem unbiased and are entertaining.
Andy's Airgun Reviews also only does positive reviews but I haven't seen any that I thought were dubious.
TbT Tinbum Tuning doesn't really do reviews so much as he talks about different guns and tuning them, but I think he really knows his stuff.
 
I like Airgun Detectives!

Note, he doesn't view them all but I have found him to be a good resource.
I watch all of his videos. They're good for things like chrono numbers and an overview of the products. The problem I have with them is that it appears that his groups are heavily cherry picked. Seriously, I don't think I've ever seen him shoot a group with pellets that measured more than 1/2" and when he did his review of the .72 Zeus he claimed that the DonnyFL Great Kami would make it backyard friendly. That's just straight up BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WoodWelder
I think that negative reviews are usually the best ones. We need to hear more about which guns don't measure up and why.
I agree, i get tired of "Its so great", and you get it in your hands and it has a crap trigger, feels like a polished brick, or weighs a ton.
 
I've made this point to my wife many times.
One of the reasons I became a member of these forums is to get real world reports from folks that actually buy and use the guns rather than someone that has to worry about getting his next FREE gun to review.
That's an excellent point about the freebies being dependent on good reviews. I've seen some of the more honest reviewers admit to this and claim that they simply don't make videos if the product isn't good. The Airguns of Alaska channel is very amateurish, pretty much just an ordinary shooter talking about his experiences with airguns, so when he slammed the Umarex Synergis he wasn't risking any sponsorships.

Walnut and Steel is kind of interesting as a channel, but I find that his testing protocols are so casual that I don't learn anything from it. Typically he just shoots a few groups offhand and that doesn't really give me much insight into how accurate the rifles he's testing are.
 
Unfortunately, this site is paid for by the advertisers, no cost to the users, so most even remotely negative comments just disappear.
Not so, Sir, have you seen Firewalker's and my comments on the JTS Airacuda Max? Not pretty but honest representation of the truth, all still alive and well in the archives. WM
 
Teds holdover gave a few including EdGun and pissed Ed off lol. Personally, I agree with most his reviews and find his videos informative and entertaining.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe he was the or one of the original founders of AGN.
Am curious to watch, which model was it on please? TIA