D
Deleted member 46449
Guest
Sounds like one day your City might be used as a case study on how not to handle feral cats, I mean will be used as a case study
You got that right. It's so absurd, it's kind of comical. These are elected officials who are SUPPOSED to be looking out for the city and it's residents. I just fail to see how anything this ludicrous can actually be proposed in an open council meeting. The sad thing is that there will be a horde of cat lovers who will praise the action. And once again, don't anybody misunderstand me. I don't really want to have to euthanize thousands of cats. The problem is that we are at a point where that is the ONLY reasonable alternative.
Right now I have a contractor in the house doing some work. He owns several rent houses in town and just bought 9 more. He has told me that they have had to trap as many as 50 to 75 cats at a couple of his houses because the houses have been sitting empty and became a place where the cats got out of the weather. He told me of another fellow that also has rent houses in town that had to trap over 100 cats at one location where he bought three house in a row. It's simply out of control and these dingbats think that a catch and release program will solve the problem.
I also just found out the "logic" behind this program. These mental midgets think that by spaying and neutering all the cats they catch, the cat population will eventually just dwindle to nothing and be gone because all the cats will just grow old and die. Hey, I can't make this crap up. That's the reasoning behind the whole catch and release program. The one council member that DOES have a little sense is the gal I've been communicating with. She hit the nail on the head when she said, "That idiotic logic assumes that they will actually catch, spay/neuter every cat roaming free. It also assumes that not one resident of this city will allow their cats to roam free after the catch and release is complete." It's Orwellian politics at it's finest.
Upvote 0