Airguns are regulated in many States already. Eventually the argument might be made that HP PCP Airguns are a close enough substitute and thus require more stringent regulation. Would the right to bear arms apply to Airguns if they are not classified as firearms?Firearm uses an explosive to propel the projectile, Airgun uses compressed gas.
The GCA 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(3) defines the term “firearm” as:
(A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily
be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive;
(B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon;
(C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or
(D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.
Congress would have to change the law for airguns to be regulated as firearms. Unlikely to happen in the foreseeable future. Regards
Upvote 0