1.- More power or less power just making turns clockwise or counterclockwise, that easy. None of the other alternatives offer that.
2.- Same accuracy or even more than all of them, both, close or far away.
3.- No possibility of electronics failure as in the Delta.
4.- No need of professional tunning on micro and macro as needed in the M3.
5.- More power than the one obtainable on the Vulcan 3 with shorter total length and less weight.
6.- No need of special but pad, nor a raiser on the scope rail, nor to buy an extra rail under the bottle as in the Delta and the M3.
7.- No need to buy a bigger bottle as in the case of the Delta Wolf.
8.- If wanted to change the caliber (22 -25, not 30), just to unscrew actual barrel and screw the new one and taking out the actual magazine and insert the new caliber one, without removing additional pieces, nor hammer, nor any kind of pin, as M3 and Delta need.
9.- No batteries that could need replacement.
10.- No software that could need update.
11.- No side level smooth nor stiff, automatic mechanism.
12.- No plastic magazine that can be broken or that can malfunction, as could happen with the M3.
13.- Certainty of accuracy with both pellets and slugs without the need of buying another barrel or additional pieces.
Well, those were the analized points to drove to go for another Sidewinder instead of for a Delta Wolf, a M3 or a Vulcan 3 700, all in .25 Cal.
Good bye for those three rifles that always had as a "very nice to eventually buy".
2.- Same accuracy or even more than all of them, both, close or far away.
3.- No possibility of electronics failure as in the Delta.
4.- No need of professional tunning on micro and macro as needed in the M3.
5.- More power than the one obtainable on the Vulcan 3 with shorter total length and less weight.
6.- No need of special but pad, nor a raiser on the scope rail, nor to buy an extra rail under the bottle as in the Delta and the M3.
7.- No need to buy a bigger bottle as in the case of the Delta Wolf.
8.- If wanted to change the caliber (22 -25, not 30), just to unscrew actual barrel and screw the new one and taking out the actual magazine and insert the new caliber one, without removing additional pieces, nor hammer, nor any kind of pin, as M3 and Delta need.
9.- No batteries that could need replacement.
10.- No software that could need update.
11.- No side level smooth nor stiff, automatic mechanism.
12.- No plastic magazine that can be broken or that can malfunction, as could happen with the M3.
13.- Certainty of accuracy with both pellets and slugs without the need of buying another barrel or additional pieces.
Well, those were the analized points to drove to go for another Sidewinder instead of for a Delta Wolf, a M3 or a Vulcan 3 700, all in .25 Cal.
Good bye for those three rifles that always had as a "very nice to eventually buy".
Last edited:
