I have always been thinking, there have to be a downside to "hard" ammo in say barrels like the FX ones or polygonal ones, that in my perspective dont " grab " that hard on the Projectile.
And i really got to think that way when i shot 16 grain H&N slugs in my Maverick VS 16 grain Zan slugs, cuz they performed wildly different, so the Zans i could get to "group", but then changing to the H&N not even did they suddenly land a totally different place, they also pretty much did not group.
But i have learned / figured out since then it is not quite that simple with ammo even if it is same weight.
As these in .22 are 15 grain, i do hope the .177 model are not made on the 13 gr mold CUZ i think that would make them lighter than 10 grain.
Though that might just be me being too much of a 13grain fanboy, 10 grain do also shoot fine in my rifles, at least as good as i have been able to get 16 or 20 grain lead projectiles to work for me ( though 10 grain testing was hampered by my original 600 mm barrel that was no good, but before i ran out i did see them fly really well in my Vulcan 3 )
And i really got to think that way when i shot 16 grain H&N slugs in my Maverick VS 16 grain Zan slugs, cuz they performed wildly different, so the Zans i could get to "group", but then changing to the H&N not even did they suddenly land a totally different place, they also pretty much did not group.
But i have learned / figured out since then it is not quite that simple with ammo even if it is same weight.
As these in .22 are 15 grain, i do hope the .177 model are not made on the 13 gr mold CUZ i think that would make them lighter than 10 grain.
Though that might just be me being too much of a 13grain fanboy, 10 grain do also shoot fine in my rifles, at least as good as i have been able to get 16 or 20 grain lead projectiles to work for me ( though 10 grain testing was hampered by my original 600 mm barrel that was no good, but before i ran out i did see them fly really well in my Vulcan 3 )
Upvote 0