![]()
I dunno... This group is five rounds at nine yards with a $140 QB77 with a ten dollar flea-market Gamo scope and the Crosman pellets I got from WalMart. So I'm thinking that a "budget gun" isn't all that bad a thing. My Beeman .22 QB78 shoots almost as well with a $5 scope.
Others should post their budget groups so that we can see the down-range reality.
Ride on,
J~
I would never question that an inexpensive gun is capable of fantastic groups.
The range that I take small game at is from 30 to 55 yards plus or minus. For me, if I aim at a living animal, I must be able to hit kill zone sized targets at that range all day long and twice on Sundays. I don't care what the cost of the rifle is, I must trust it implicitly.
I have one cheap xisico that I trust like that. The rest of my affordable alternatives won't do. I love shooting them, but they have proven inconsistent enough at my hunting/pesting ranges that I won't use them. I love them and would never part with them.
I've never been a snob, ever, on this or any forum period. I love the less expensive alternatives, which often get people started in the field. They also often deter people from the field. After a few cheap springers I had all but given up until I shot an hw97. When I saw what it could do, I was brought back into the fold. Additionally, I still pick up affordable as is obvious from my more recent xisico. And that gun has paid off in dividends.
You probably decrease your odds of a lemon as you go up in price, and hopefully increase customer support as well. You probably increase your odds of a lemon as you decrease in price. Simple as that.
Still I'll never avoid a cheap springer or a good deal....
Enjoy what you got, and don't spend more than you have...
Upvote 0