The Really Ugly Duckling - the .25 Kalibrgun Cricket Maintenance and Performance Review

Never really believing that I have much of a use for a true bullpup, nor believing they could ever shoot as accurate as a full length rifle, because I didn't have one in my collection, I purchased this Charlie Frear tuned .25 Cricket from another AGN member a few months back. I tested it with four different .25 pellets upon acquisition, but the 33.95 gr easily outperformed the others.

I hate the way it cocks at the back as it seems totally awkward to me. It is much louder than my more conventional rifles with threaded moderators. It is as ugly as ugly can be, but as far as power and accuracy, WOW. I guess beauty is somewhat in the eyes of the beholder. It is built like a tank and is very efficient from an accuracy & power plant perspective.

It didn't take much maintenance effort to check this rifle out as it has only been a couple of months since I went through the check-out and set-up phase at the time of acquisition from this site's on-line classified forum. The test results can be seen below for those interested.

1 - Rifle image.11.19.22.jpg
2 - 18 yard test target.11.19.22.jpg
3 - 51 yard test target.jpg
4 - 81 yard Test Target.jpg
 
bdzjlz -

Agreed, I don't care for that (your) stock OR the antiquated, rear cocking lever either.

I waited, and got the Cricket II (also from Charlie Frear) . Visually, the MkII has a much nicer stock (WSA), forward cocking lever, not too loud. But yeah, as you say, overall, a nice gun. Easy to hold to shoot freehand fairly accurately, comfortable at the shoulder .
It is a very solid gun, with an addball (rotary) safety ! I really like this style magazine. No moving or plastic parts to break. ALL airguns need this style magazine.

1669416497066.jpeg



Mike