Welcome to the FX club. I’ve been a believer for a while now. Their guns simply deliver. Excellent triggers, good ergonomics, outstanding accuracy, tunability, etc.
Upvote 0
I have been struggling with the Panthera dilemma myself. At first it was the new shiny object and I recognized it shortly after it hit and told myself to be patient and see what kind of kinks need ironed out before jumping in.
Then I read posts extolling the performance and features that really make some difference and I am back on it again. This posting has rattled my cage again. I have observed CTairgunner posts and he ain’t no FX fan boy and seems pragmatic as well.
Now I am contemplating again.
They are indeed the apple of airguns. This one performs. Ive yet to see a production air rifle with a shot string like this one.Ho hum, another FX version of an airgun. Now they have shotguns and guns that shoot arrows. What next? Maybe a toilet plunger model.
Why is it any different than the other FX guns? They kinda used the same receiver block with some modifications, then mounted the air bottle in the back. True, maybe the guts are a bit different. Then, they mounted this hugely long barrel on it. I'm sure the barrel uses the same liners. This isn't a carry piece because it's so long, IMO, but a bench gun. Performance specs are in the same ballpark as other FX rifles, so tell my why this is so good?I will say the Pantera is the only air rifle from FX that I'd consider. But then again short of a competition gun or pester you could set up from a spot I don't see much use for me. But does sound like a nice gun that's more robust than any of there other offerings.
If you distill it down, every new airgun is just another version of an airgun. Which is near enough a fancy blow dart.Ho hum, another FX version of an airgun. Now they have shotguns and guns that shoot arrows. What next? Maybe a toilet plunger model.
Who's being bitter? I'm just questioning the reason for the existence of this rifle. I have 4 FX rifles now and all shoot very well. To me, it looks like a Crown that has had it's bottle moved to the rear. If it truly excels in some respect, tell me? Is it accuracy, shot count , is it power? I can't seem to see that. Every other FX can be jacked up in power as much as the other. I can equip any of my rifles with 500, 600, 700, or 800 mm barrels just like this one.If you distill it down, every new airgun is just another version of an airgun. Which is near enough a fancy blow dart.
This particular version is however a genuinely a good product, whatever you think of the rest of the FX offerings.
Be careful of coming across petty and bitter. It's little better than the unicorn crap spouted by all the oily ticks responsible for FX's YouTube marketing.
Why is it any different than the other FX guns? They kinda used the same receiver block with some modifications, then mounted the air bottle in the back. True, maybe the guts are a bit different. Then, they mounted this hugely long barrel on it. I'm sure the barrel uses the same liners. This isn't a carry piece because it's so long, IMO, but a bench gun. Performance specs are in the same ballpark as other FX rifles, so tell my why this is so good?
You sound bitter. In your toilet plunger comment about an airgun.Who's being bitter? I'm just questioning the reason for the existence of this rifle. I have 4 FX rifles now and all shoot very well. To me, it looks like a Crown that has had it's bottle moved to the rear. If it truly excels in some respect, tell me? Is it accuracy, shot count , is it power? I can't seem to see that. Every other FX can be jacked up in power as much as the other. I can equip any of my rifles with 500, 600, 700, or 800 mm barrels just like this one.
For me the plenum holding the barrel in place makes it much more rigid than any of there previous rifles that alone is a big reason. I'd go 500mm but again too long for my wants and needs. Alot are saying the cocking is better in smoothness and robustness than other FX guns. ARCA rail built in is big for me as I went that route on my other guns personally.Why is it any different than the other FX guns? They kinda used the same receiver block with some modifications, then mounted the air bottle in the back. True, maybe the guts are a bit different. Then, they mounted this hugely long barrel on it. I'm sure the barrel uses the same liners. This isn't a carry piece because it's so long, IMO, but a bench gun. Performance specs are in the same ballpark as other FX rifles, so tell my why this is so good?
I bought a Crown with a 600 MM barrel and though it was way too long. I almost sold it, but bought a 380 MM barrel. With some minor tuning, I'm getting excellent performance and accuracy from it and love it's circumcised length. Wouldn't it be nice if FX gave you the option of barrel length when you buy a rifle?For me the plenum holding the barrel in place makes it much more rigid than any of there previous rifles that alone is a big reason. I'd go 500mm but again too long for my wants and needs. Alot are saying the cocking is better in smoothness and robustness than other FX guns. ARCA rail built in is big for me as I went that route on my other guns personally.
But was just saying the only FX I'd be interested in, not that I'd get one. Too long for what I like even the 500mm one. The others are just way too long and silly, but I've thought that with a number of rifles like the HP Redwolfs and Wolverines and Crowns and Texans and RAWs. I think 700mm and 800mm barrels are silly on bullpups as well. I'm on opposite end of spectrum and prefer guns with 10-16" barrels. But we all have different preferences. If they made a 380mm version then I'd definitely have a hard time looking past it. Setup for shooting lightweight slugs would be fun.
on March 20th, speaking with Brian on the phone I decided at that time to place an order for a custom Artemis M16A (CF Bottle swap, trigger work, valve and hammer work, and a custom slug barrel with muzzle break) with the agreement it would be done in two weeks so that I could practice with it.